ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparisons of aged samples and modern references provide algorithm for mtDNA analysis in challenging material.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Precision ID mtDNA Whole Genome Panel and sequencing of telogen hairs - perspectives for validation and implementation in casework.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Based on results of over 12 years of research, we performed a comparative analysis of haplotypes from 70 to 80 years old bone samples with modern high quality references. Whole mitochondrial genomes were obtained for the purpose of human identification cases conducted by the Polish Genetic Database of Victims of Totalitarianisms-Pomeranian Medical University Research Centre, using Thermo Fisher Scientific's Precision ID line and Ion GeneStudio S5. Converge 2.2 and IGV 2.12.3 were used for secondary sequence analysis and their parameters were altered to construct a new variant calling algorithm. We have found neither a simple change in thresholds, nor removing contaminant reads significantly decreased the number of discrepancies found between haplotype pairs, and conclude that standard analysis settings can rarely be used for poor quality DNA data. The study confirmed some limitations of the analysis of low-quality samples, and of the familial comparisons themselves. Still, the algorithm we developed helps to decide which calls to accept when dealing with difficult material, reducing manual labour, based on Converge-generated Status and EMPOP state of the variants. Additional step for samples with low region coverage is introduced. This protocol can be used in other areas where DNA quantity and quality are low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.