ArticleScientific reports2025
Relationship of social capital, community identity, and perceived safety resilience during public emergencies in Shanghai.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community resilience is important to public safety in the face of unexpected disruptions caused by public emergencies. In addressing how to improve the ability of community systems to absorb, adapt, learn, and recover when confronted with the perturbations of public emergencies, this study examines the relationships among three types of social capital (SC), community identity (CI), and community resilience from the perspective of social psychology. The study introduces the notion of perceived community safety resilience (PCSR) based on the concepts of perceived resilience and safety resilience, and then conducts theoretical modeling of the relationships among PCSR, CI, and SC. Using public health emergencies in Shanghai from March to June 2022 as an example, our hypotheses were tested through structural equation modeling with survey data from 349 Shanghai residents. The results show that Bonding SC, Bridging SC, and Linking SC are correlated with each other. Bonding SC and Linking SC have significant positive effects on CI and PCSR, while the effect of Bridging SC on CI and the effect of Bridging SC on PCSR are not significant. CI has varying degrees of partial mediation effects between the three types of SC and PCSR. Under China's emergency management model, Linking SC plays the most critical role in enhancing CI and PSCR. However, the hypothesized relationships between Bridging SC and PCSR, as well as between Bridging SC and CI, are not significant. To improve the community's ability to respond to emergencies, more attention should be paid to the cultivation of Bridging SC. The results contribute to understanding the current relationships among SC, CI, and PCSR. This study provides a reference for policymakers and community residents to enhance community resilience in the face of public emergencies through the cultivation of SC and CI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.