ArticleScientific data2025
Applying the FAIR Principles to computational workflows.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Twelve quick tips for designing AI-driven HPC workflows.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Challenges and Vision for Standardization of Biopolymer Data Sets for Machine Learning.Biomacromolecules · 2026Review
- A scoping review of approaches to evaluating workflow management systems for bioinformatics users.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- DiaReport: reproducible workflow for differential expression analysis and interactive reporting in DIA-based proteomics.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Comparative review of artificial intelligence for transcriptomic biomarker discovery in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- To Be FAIR: Theory Specification Needs an Update.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2026Article
- Managing workflow executions with WESkit.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Article
- How benchmarking of bioinformatics tools is essential for informed workflow selection: a case study on SARS-CoV-2 subgenomic RNA detection.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Article
- WorkflowHub: a registry for computational workflows.Scientific data · 2025Article
- SbD4Skin by EosCloud: Integrating multi-view molecular representation for predicting skin sensitization, irritation, and acute dermal toxicity.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- A Vision for VenomsBase: An Integrated Knowledgebase for the Study of Venoms and Their Applications.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- AI-Y: An AI Checklist for Population Ethics Across the Global Context.Current epidemiology reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.