ArticleScientific reports2025
Performance evaluation of concrete blended with industrial and agricultural wastes reinforced with hybrid fibres - a feasibility study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical and flexural fatigue behaviour of steel fibre reinforced RAP-based concrete: experimental and machine learning investigation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Machine learning-driven optimization of alkali-activated sustainable pavement concrete incorporating agro-industrial wastes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Mechanical, elastic, and damage behavior of structural green concrete incorporating walnut shell aggregate.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Mechanical property enhancement in concrete composites with hybrid polypropylene fibre reinforcement.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Engineering and research challenges include exhausting traditional construction resources and disposing of garbage. In order to solve these issues, industrial or agricultural waste is being extensively studied as a construction material alternative. Primary wastes in our country are Fly Ash (FA) and Coconut Shell (CS). They can cause major waste disposal concerns if mismanaged. This study is a feasibility study on employing FA (an industrial waste) as binder and coconut shell (an agricultural waste) as coarse aggregates. The composite obtained by incorporating waste materials is reinforced with hybrid fibres to enhance its mechanical performance. The work undertaken comprises four distinct phases, the first phase evaluates reference mix with conventional materials. FA is utilized as SCM in concrete in the second phase. In the third phase, Coconut Shell Aggregate (CSA) is used to partially replace Natural Coarse Aggregate (NCA). In the final phase, fibres in different proportions of polypropylene and steel fibres are included to Coconut Shell Aggregate Concrete (CSAC). The findings demonstrate that replacing up to 20% of cement with FA enhances compressive, split tensile and flexural strengths by 8.1%, 5.9%, and 7.8%, respectively. The use of CSA, while slightly reducing strength parameters compared to NCA. The incorporation of 1% steel fibers (SF) significantly enhanced the mechanical properties of CSA-based concrete, achieving increases of 11.9%, 33.0%, and 30.7% in compressive, split tensile, and flexural strengths, respectively. Adding 0.2% polypropylene fibers (PPF) to SF further amplified these strengths by 3.5%, 13.5%, and 15.6%, respectively and decrease the brittleness and improve the post-peak toughness. Advanced statistical method response surface method and artificial neural network (ANN) modeling using MATLAB proved highly effective for predicting compressive strength, with ANN showing superior accuracy compared to the response surface method. The results indicate that hybrid fibre reinforced coconut shell aggregate concrete (HFRCSAC) mixture has significant potential for use in civil engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.