Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994164›Full record

ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2025

PENELOPE 1-year follow-up: legacy effect of a short protocol-led LDL-C-lowering strategy in patients after myocardial infarction.

Sander van der Brug, Tinka van Trier, Aaram Omar Khader, An-Ho Liem, Astrid Schut, Fabrice Martens, Marco Alings, PENELOPE investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. PENELOPE-CTRL: protocolised LDL-C lowering compared to real-world care in patients after myocardial infarction.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025
    Article
  4. Timelines, targets, and transitions in cardiovascular care.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025
    Article
  5. Introducing the 'Transforming cardiology with AI' series.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sander van der BrugDepartment of Cardiology, Amphia Ziekenhuis, Breda, The Netherlands. sandervanderbrug@gmail.com.
Tinka van TrierDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Aaram Omar KhaderDepartment of Cardiology, Amphia Ziekenhuis, Breda, The Netherlands.
An-Ho LiemWorkgroup Cardiology, Centres Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Astrid SchutWorkgroup Cardiology, Centres Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Fabrice MartensDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marco AlingsDepartment of Cardiology, Amphia Ziekenhuis, Breda, The Netherlands.
PENELOPE investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduces the risk of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). In the PENELOPE study, a guideline-based, protocol-led LDL-C-lowering strategy was applied in patients after myocardial infarction and resulted in 87% reaching target LDL‑C levels of ≤ 1.8 mmol/l within a median of 45 days. This study evaluated PENELOPE's legacy effect on LDL‑C levels after 1 year.

methodsIn the PENELOPE study, 999 patients with a myocardial infarction and a history of ASCVD and/or diabetes mellitus were included. If LDL-C > 1.8 mmol/l, lipid-lowering therapy was intensified in three consecutive steps: (1) high-intensity statin (HIST) monotherapy, (2) HIST + ezetimibe, and (3) HIST + ezetimibe + proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i). LDL‑C levels were monitored 4-6 weeks after each step. The primary objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of the LDL‑C target level of ≤ 1.8 mmol/l being maintained after 1 year.

resultsData of 738 patients (74%) were available for 1‑year follow-up. The target LDL‑C level was met in 471 patients (64%). Median LDL‑C levels changed from 1.5 (1.2-1.7) mmol/l immediately after implementation of the protocol-led strategy to 1.6 (1.3-2.0) mmol/l after 1 year. Major treatment regimens were statin (58%), statin + ezetimibe (30%) and PCSK9i + ezetimibe (+ statin) (7%).

conclusionAfter a myocardial infarction, implementation of a protocol-led LDL-C-lowering strategy resulted in 87% of patients attaining the LDL‑C target level of ≤ 1.8 mmol/l within a median of 45 (32-77) days. At 1‑year follow-up, 64% maintained this target level and the median LDL‑C increased by 0.1 mmol/l.

Indexed as

EzetimibeFollow-up studyHydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitorsLow-density lipoprotein cholesterolProprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitorsSecondary prevention

Identifiers

PMID39994164
PMCPMC11953483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.