Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994148›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2025

Novel adulterants in unregulated opioids and their associations with adverse events.

Samuel Tobias, Jennifer Angelucci, Evan Wood, Jane A Buxton, Lianping Ti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Donovan Memorial Lecture: 'Fentanyl-Plus': A New Era of Fentanyl Polydrug Combinations in the North American Overdose Crisis.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Responding to the toxic drug crisis: Promising innovations, gaps, and calls to action.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel TobiasBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6051-8950
Jennifer AngelucciBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Evan WoodBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9412-6699
Jane A BuxtonSchool of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2295-393X
Lianping TiBritish Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, BC, Canada. bccsu-lt@bccsu.ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-2470-438X

Funding

Evaluation of Drug Checking as a Novel Intervention to Address the Opioid Overdose Crisis Attributable to Fentanyl and its AnaloguesR01DA052381 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA · PI TI, LIANPING · 2021 to 2023
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA052381NIDA NIH HHS R01DA052381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn recent years, Canada's unregulated drug supply has become permeated by novel adulterants (e.g., fentanyl analogues, benzodiazepines, xylazine). While fentanyl has been shown to be associated with overdose mortality and other non-fatal health outcomes, adverse events (AE) associated with these adulterants remain poorly described. This study seeks to identify whether common adulterants identified through drug checking services are associated with increased prevalence of specific adverse events reportedly experienced by people who use drugs.

methodsDrug checking samples were analyzed using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and immunoassay strips at harm reduction sites in British Columbia. Self-reported AE (e.g., non-fatal overdose, prolonged sedation, seizures) were recorded from individuals who checked opioids post-consumption. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of AE among common adulterants were calculated using generalized linear models with a Poisson distribution, controlled for presence of other adulterants, expected drug, geographic location, and month.

resultsBetween February 2022 and May 2024, 80,415 samples were analyzed at community sites. Among eligible samples, 36.1% were expected opioids, 42.2% of which were checked post-consumption. AE were noted among 10.7% of post-consumption opioid drug checks. After adjustment, the presence of benzodiazepines in opioid samples was associated with increased prevalence of any AE (aPR 1.97; 95% CI 1.70-2.27), as was the presence of xylazine (aPR 1.50; 95% CI 1.09-2.07). Considering specific AE, benzodiazepines were associated with increased prevalence of overdose (aPR 2.05; 95% CI 1.68-2.51) and prolonged sedation (aPR 3.35; 95% CI 2.54-4.43).

conclusionNon-fatal AE associated with unregulated opioids have been largely undescribed. Our findings report specific AE associated with different adulterants in the unregulated opioid supply. With this information, tailored public health interventions and services focused on these adulterants can be developed.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidDrug ContaminationDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsAdolescentAdultBritish ColumbiaDrug OverdoseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidAdverse drug eventsBenzodiazepinesDrug checkingXylazine

Identifiers

PMID39994148
PMCPMC12381341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.