Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39994092›Full record

ArticlePain and therapy2025

Headache Phenotype and the Psychosocial Burden of Cluster Headaches: An Analysis of Patients Prior to Hospitalization.

Carl Hartmut Göbel, Britta Koch, Katja Heinze-Kuhn, Axel Heinze, Anna Cirkel, Hartmut Göbel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Hallmarks of primary headache: part 3 - cluster headache.The journal of headache and pain · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carl Hartmut GöbelDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus, Kiel, Germany. cg@schmerzklinik.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4283-6936
Britta KochKiel Migraine and Headache Centre, Heikendorfer Weg 9-27, 24149, Kiel, Germany.
Katja Heinze-KuhnKiel Migraine and Headache Centre, Heikendorfer Weg 9-27, 24149, Kiel, Germany.
Axel HeinzeKiel Migraine and Headache Centre, Heikendorfer Weg 9-27, 24149, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-7780-4301
Anna CirkelDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8637-9637
Hartmut GöbelKiel Migraine and Headache Centre, Heikendorfer Weg 9-27, 24149, Kiel, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2163-112X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe specific headache phenotype, accompanying symptoms and psychological impact that lead to admission of patients with cluster headache are not yet known. The aim of this study was therefore to analyze the characteristics of patients who were admitted to a tertiary headache center in 2018, 2019 and 2020 due to cluster headache.

methodsA total of 207 patients with cluster headache were examined, who were admitted to the Kiel Headache Center, a tertiary headache center in Germany, in the years 2018, 2019, and 2020. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the phenotype and psychosocial impact of cluster headaches in a standardized manner. The data were collected based on information from the standardized Kiel Headache Questionnaire, the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire, and the World Health Organization (WHO) Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0).

resultsMost of the patients had a chronic course of disease over many years, and 71.5% had had the disease for more than 5 years. Cluster headache attacks occurred in 98.6% of the patients, with strong to very strong pain intensity, and more than 78% of the patients experienced three or more attacks per day. Nighttime occurrence led to severe sleep disturbances with exhaustion, a lack of energy, and an inability to work. In 31.4% of the patients, persistent pain in the area also contributed to the inability to work. A total of 94.7% of the patients had a MIDAS score of grade 4. The analysis of the WHODAS 2.0 score revealed that 92.7% of the patients with cluster headaches experienced severe limitations in their health and functionality. These individuals were particularly severely affected by the accompanying psychological symptoms and the psychosocial impact of cluster headaches. The highly stressful complications of cluster headaches were particularly evident in the high frequency of suicidal ideation in more than 40% of the patients examined. Severe illness affected almost all areas of professional, social, and family life and caused a very high level of suffering.

conclusionsThe results revealed a pronounced, severe symptom complex in patients with cluster headaches that went far beyond the purely diagnostic criteria. The psychosocial impact of cluster headaches should be given close attention in the care of these patients.

Indexed as

Cluster headacheComorbidityComplicationsDepressionDisabilityHeadache phenotypeHospitalizationInpatient treatmentPsychological effectsPsychosocial burdenSuicidalityTreatment refractory

Identifiers

PMID39994092
PMCPMC11914562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.