ArticleFish physiology and biochemistry2025
Comparison of growth performance, oxidative stress, and intestinal microbiota of rockfish (Sebastiscus marmoratus) in different culture modes.
Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the response of fish intestines to different culture modes, we conducted a comparative trial on rockfish in the recirculating aquaculture system (RAS) and offshore aquaculture net pen system (OAS). After the 152-day trial, we compared the differences in growth performance, antioxidant capacity, intestinal morphology, and intestinal microbiota to evaluate the health status of rockfish cultured in these two modes. Results showed that rockfish cultured in the RAS exhibited a superior growth performance and antioxidant capacity compared to those cultured in OAS. Histological examination indicated pathological lesions in the intestine of rockfish cultured in the OAS, including a disordered arrangement of epithelial cells, rupture of chorionic villi, and decreased thickness of the muscle layer, which may further cause damage to intestinal barrier function. Sequencing analysis of 16S rDNA showed that Firmicutes, Bacteroidota, and Proteobacteria were the dominant phyla in the rockfish intestines. Microbial community diversity analysis indicated that there were significant differences in intestinal bacterial richness and diversity between the two groups; however, no differences were observed in the dominant bacteria. The relative abundance of metabolic pathways (such as energy, carbohydrate, and lipid metabolism) in the OAS group was significantly enhanced. Furthermore, the relative abundance of conditional pathogenic and potentially pathogenic bacteria increased, and that of beneficial and stress-tolerant bacteria decreased in the OAS group, indicating potential inflammation in the intestine. This study accumulated basic biological information for the study of fish welfare cultured in different modes and will contribute to the understanding of the physiological and health status of the rockfish.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39994088What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.