ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Comprehensive clinical scale-based machine learning model for predicting subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation outcomes in Parkinson's disease.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advancements of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Machine Learning: Methods, Challenges, and Opportunities.Transactions on artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a growing burden with varied clinical manifestations and responses to Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation (STN-DBS). At present, there is no effective and simple machine learning model based on comprehensive clinical scales to predict the improvement in motor symptoms of PD treated with DBS. A total of 647 PD patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China were enrolled retrospectively. LightGBM machine learning algorithm was used for modeling, and 123 PD patients from Qingdao Municipal Hospital were used as external data to verify the effectiveness of the model. The study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry with the registration number of ChiCTR2300073955. The LightGBM model outperformed others, demonstrating an internal test set AUC of 0.874 (95%CI [0.822-0.927]) and an average AUC of 0.921 ± 0.03 during cross-validation. The external validation yielded an AUC of 0.769 (95% CI[0.685-0.853]). Key predictive variables identified include MMSE scores, HAMA scores, years of education, medication improvement rate, and preoperative UPDRS scores. The results indicate that the LightGBM model based on the top seven influencing factors is a promising tool for predicting the improvement in motor symptoms of PD after 1 year of STN-DBS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39994077What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.