ArticleJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2025
Multi-Omics Analysis of Aberrances and Functional Implications of IRF5 in Digestive Tract Tumours.
Article in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oesophageal cancer (EC) is a common gastrointestinal malignancy and includes oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) sub-types. Gene signatures predicting patient outcomes are not routinely used in clinical practice, particularly owing to batch effects and data standardisation. Here, we sought to establish and validate a reliable signature of senescence-related genes (SRGs) that would aid in predicting prognosis in patients with EC. We downloaded transcriptomics data, and a novel pairwise comparison algorithm selected valid SRG pairs (SRGPs) to construct a prognostic SRGP signature. The SRGPs were verified using Kaplan-Meier survival and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. Additionally, the relationships between the SRGP signatures and prognosis, immune cell infiltration and chemotherapeutic drug responsiveness were evaluated. The random forest algorithm identified the most clinically significant genes, followed by experimental validation. 19 and 26 SRGP signatures were created for ESCC (n = 81) and EAC (n = 79), respectively. Patients with EC were divided into two groups based on the median risk score. The Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significant differences in overall survival between the ESCC and EAC groups (p < 0.001). The sub-types exhibited different immune signatures. IRF5 was the most clinically significant gene for ESCC. It was highly expressed in ESCC cells, and IRF5 knockdown inhibited cell migration and proliferation, while promoting apoptosis and senescence. The SRGP signature may predict prognosis and immunotherapeutic responses, and IRF5 is a potential target gene for ESCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.