Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39993944›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2025

NSE and ProGRP Are Promising Markers for Diagnosis, Efficacy Evaluation, Follow-Up Monitoring, and Prognosis of Small Cell Esophageal Carcinoma.

Di Liu, Dan Wu, Jianjiao Ni, Junhua Zhang, Suhong Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Di LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5880-8692
Dan WuFacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jianjiao NiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Junhua ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8936-3822
Suhong XieDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate the clinical implications of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron specific enolase (NSE), and pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (ProGRP) in small cell esophageal carcinoma (SCEC).

methodsReceiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of serum markers for differentiating SCEC from patients with esophageal squamous carcinoma (ESCC), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and healthy subjects.

resultsThe combination of ProGRP and NSE demonstrated significant diagnostic efficacy in distinguishing SCEC from ESCC, EAC, and healthy individuals. After treatment, serum levels of ProGRP, NSE, and CEA in SCEC patients with disease control decreased significantly compared to pre-treatment levels. Conversely, the serum levels of ProGRP and NSE in patients with disease progression after treatment were significantly increased compared to those before treatment. Compared with those in the follow-up phase, the levels of ProGRP, NSE, and CEA significantly increased after tumor progression in SCEC patients. This study further exhibited that serum levels of ProGRP above 45.15 pg/mL and NSE above 14.70 ng/mL during follow-up after first-line treatment in SCEC patients were associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS). Moreover, significant associations were observed between baseline serum concentrations of ProGRP, NSE, CEA and both PFS and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in SCEC patients.

conclusionsProGRP and NSE have significant value in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of SCEC, and are also associated with the clinical stage and prognosis of SCEC patients, as well as are effective indicators for evaluating therapeutic efficacy and disease recurrence.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Small CellEsophageal NeoplasmsPeptide FragmentsPhosphopyruvate HydrataseAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRecombinant ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorPeptide FragmentsPhosphopyruvate Hydratasepro-gastrin-releasing peptide (31-98)Recombinant Proteinsdiagnosisefficacyprognosisrelapseserum tumor markersmall cell esophageal carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID39993944
PMCPMC11850090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.