Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39993935›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2025

Understanding factors that influence the drug choice of prescribers: A Q-methodology study.

Mariëlle G Hartjes, Annelot E F Elsevier, Jan Willem Grijpma, Milan C Richir, Michiel A van Agtmael, Jelle Tichelaar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mariëlle G HartjesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7595-2570
Annelot E F ElsevierDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan Willem GrijpmaAmsterdam UMC, Research in Education, Faculty of Medicine, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Milan C RichirDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michiel A van AgtmaelDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7966-6934
Jelle TichelaarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTherapeutic decision-making often involves weighing several treatment options on the basis of, among other things, the disease profile, patient characteristics but also prescriber-specific factors. This study investigated the factors influencing therapeutic decision-making among prescribers and explores how these factors differ between healthcare professionals.

methodsThis Q-methodology study involved 37 participants from different medical backgrounds, including physicians, dentists, midwives, physician assistants and advanced nurse practitioners from various intra- and extramural settings in the Netherlands. Participants ranked 55 factors on their importance for medication prescribing, and factor analysis was used to identify distinct prescriber profiles. These profiles were subsequently enriched using qualitative data derived from post-sorting interviews.

resultsFour prescriber profiles were identified that explained 59% of the study variance: pragmatic contextual, guideline oriented, experience driven and vulnerability focused. Several factors were ranked differently in each profile. The pragmatic contextual profile emphasized patient context and risk prevention, the guideline-oriented profile adhered to clinical guidelines, the experience-driven profile relied on clinical experience and patient-centred communication, and the vulnerability-focused profile prioritized personalized care for specific patient groups.

conclusionThis study sheds light on the diverse factors influencing prescriber decision-making in medical practice. By identifying four prescriber profiles, it reveals the complexity and diversity in how prescribers balance guidelines, clinical experience and patient-specific considerations in their practice. These findings offer direction for developing educational and policy initiatives to enhance the quality of prescribing, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingDrug PrescriptionsPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPractice Guidelines as Topiceducationmedical educationprescribingquality use of medicines

Identifiers

PMID39993935
PMCPMC12304866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.