Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39993914›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine2025

The General Public Vastly Overestimates Primary Care Spending in the United States.

Melissa Ma, Rebecca Etz, Andrew Bazemore, Kevin Grumbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Power of Primary Care to Improve Health.Annals of family medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. The Power of Primary Care to Improve Health.PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melissa MaSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California Melissa.Ma@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7800-4624
Rebecca EtzThe Larry A. Green Center, Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University.
Andrew BazemoreThe American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky.
Kevin GrumbachDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assessed public perceptions of US primary care spending. An online survey was conducted using SurveyMonkey Audience (Symphony Technology Group), achieving a sample of 1,135 adult respondents reflective of the demographic distribution of the US adult population. Respondents' mean estimate of the percentage of US health care spending funding primary care was 51.8% (SD 24.8, interquartile range [IQR] 40). Respondents' mean estimate of the percentage of health care needs addressed by primary care was 58.7% (SD 22.2, IQR 28.5) These results reveal a tremendous disparity between current levels of primary care spending (4.7%) and public perceptions of primary care expenditure and value.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresPrimary Health CarePublic OpinionAdultFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited Stateshealth care reformhealth expenditureshealth policyprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID39993914
PMCPMC11936356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.