ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025
Modic Changes in Patients Who Have Undergone Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: The Correlation With Fusion Success and Subsidence.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of structured psychological support on anxiety and recovery in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a randomized controlled trial.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Influence of Modic changes on short-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Risk factors of early subsidence of 3D-printed artificial vertebral body following single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF): retrospective study of 98 patients.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThere is a lack of research on modic change (MC) in the cervical spine, especially regarding its impact on patients following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Some researchers strongly believe that MC may affect the prognosis after anterior cervical surgery. Thus, this study aimed to assess MC in patients who underwent ACDF, investigating its incidence, risk factors, and correlation with fusion success and subsidence rate.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 154 patients who underwent single-level ACDF from January 2010 to December 2020, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiological parameters were recorded at pre-operation, 1 week, 3 months after operation, and the last follow-up. The primary outcomes were the fusion rate and cage subsidence. Radiological measurements, including overall (Cobb C) and segmental cervical angle (Cobb S), anterior disc height (ADH), and posterior disc height (PDH) were also recorded. The independent t-test or Mann-Whiteny U test was used to compare continuous data, and categorical variables were assessed using the Pearson's chi-square test of Fisher's exact test. Logistic regression analysis was also adopted to distinguish corresponding factors related with the progress of MC.
resultsOf the 154 patients, the incidence of MC was 44.2% (68/154). The group with MC showed a larger proportion of males and osteoporosis. The fusion rate of those with MC was 88.2% (60/68) while that in the non-MC group was 97.7% (84/86, p = 0.02). The MC group presented a subsidence rate of 27.9%, which was substantially higher than in the non-MC group (9.3%, p < 0.01). NDI and VAS neck was significantly higher in the MC group than in the non-MC group (p = 0.014; p = 0.039). Sex and osteoporosis were distinguished as independent factors related to MC by regression analysis (p = 0.006; p = 0.026).
conclusionPreoperative MC could adversely hinder the fusion process and may increase the incidence of subsidence, affecting clinical outcomes of those underwent ACDF. Patients with MC, especially type 1 MC, are more easily suffered from neck pain than those without MC. Male sex and osteoporosis were risk factors for MC. In order to achieve a better bony fusion and avoid cage subsidence in those with MC, we encourage patients to prolong their immobilization duration with a cervical collar and precisely manage osteoporosis during the peri-operative period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.