Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39993837›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Smell the Label: Odors Influence Label Perception and Their Neural Processing.

Doris Schicker, Putu A Khorisantono, Qëndresa Rramani Dervishi, Shirley X L Lim, Elodie Saruco, Burkhard Pleger, Johannes Schultz, Kathrin Ohla, Jessica Freiherr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Doris SchickerSensory Analytics and Technologies, Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, Freising 85354, Germany doris.schicker@ivv.fraunhofer.de jessica.freiherr@ivv.fraunhofer.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2188-1532
Putu A KhorisantonoDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm SE-171 77, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2973-545X
Qëndresa Rramani DervishiInstitute for Patient Safety, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn 53127, Germany.
Shirley X L LimDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm SE-171 77, Sweden.
Elodie SarucoClinic for Neurology, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum 44789, Germany.
Burkhard PlegerClinic for Neurology, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum 44789, Germany.
Johannes SchultzInstitute for Experimental Epileptology and Cognition Research, University of Bonn, Bonn 53127, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4117-232X
Kathrin OhlaNutriAct-Competence Cluster Nutrition Research Berlin-Potsdam, Nuthetal 14558, Germany.
Jessica FreiherrSensory Analytics and Technologies, Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV, Freising 85354, Germany doris.schicker@ivv.fraunhofer.de jessica.freiherr@ivv.fraunhofer.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9052-4497

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing nutrition or health labels on product packaging can be an effective strategy to promote a conscious and healthier diet. However, such labels also have the potential to be counterproductive by creating obstructive expectations about the flavor of the food and influencing odor perception. Conversely, olfaction could significantly influence label perception, whereby negative expectations could be mitigated by pleasant odors. This study explored the neural processing of the interplay between odors and nutrition labels using fMRI in 63 participants of either sex, to whom we presented beverage labels with different nutrition-related statements either with or without a congruent odor. On a behavioral level, the products for which the label was presented together with the odor were in general perceived as more positive than the same labels without an odor. Neuroimaging results revealed that added odors significantly altered activity in brain regions associated with flavor and label processing as well as decision-making, with higher activations in the right amygdala/piriform cortex (Amy/pirC) and orbitofrontal cortex. The presentation of odors induced pattern-based encoding in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the left ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens, and the right Amy/pirC when accounting for behavioral differences. This suggests that odors influence the effects of labels both on a neural and behavioral level and may offer the possibility of compensating for obstructive associations. The detailed mechanisms of odor and statement interactions within the relevant brain areas should be further investigated, especially for labels that evoke negative expectations.

Indexed as

BrainFood LabelingOdorantsOlfactory PerceptionSmellAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung AdultfMRIfoodlabelnutritionodorolfaction

Identifiers

PMID39993837
PMCPMC11968547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.