Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39993829›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine & research2024

In-Hospital Management of Acute Trigeminal Neuralgia Pain Crises.

Alyssa Chow, Imran Haider, Alexandra Athanaselos, Matthew Patel

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine & research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alyssa ChowDepartment of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Imran HaiderRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Alexandra AthanaselosDepartment of Health Sciences, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew PatelDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada matthew.patel@medportal.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trigeminal neuralgia is the most common form of craniofacial neuropathic pain with an incidence of 4 to 29 per 100,000 people per year. Acute trigeminal neuralgia pain crises are characterized by increased pain frequency and severity and can impact oral intake and sleep, as well as mood. The diagnosis of acute trigeminal neuralgia is clinical and supported by magnetic resonance imaging demonstrating morphological changes in the trigeminal neurovascular bundle on the ipsilateral side of the pain. Patients often present to the hospital seeking relief from acute exacerbations, making it essential for physicians to understand the management of an acute pain crisis, which differs from the chronic management, especially as there may be limited neurology or pain specialist support after hours. The need for improved knowledge of the treatment of acute trigeminal neuralgia is evidenced by opioids being the most prescribed analgesia despite little efficacy in treating it, a lack of evidence supporting their use and concerning side-effects. This article summarizes the evidence behind pharmacological therapy with fosphenytoin, phenytoin, and lidocaine as rescue medications in acute trigeminal neuralgia through the case of a male patient, age 58 years, who experienced complete resolution of pain following administration of phenytoin.

Indexed as

Trigeminal NeuralgiaHumansLidocaineMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPhenytoinLidocainePhenytoinHeadacheLidocainePain CrisisPhenytoinTrigeminal Neuralagia

Identifiers

PMID39993829
PMCPMC11849969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.