ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025
Comparison of Prophylactic Endovascular Treatments for Threatened or Impending Internal/Common Carotid Artery Blowout Syndrome.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe outcomes of prophylactic endovascular interventions for patients facing threatened or impending carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) involving the ICA/common carotid artery (CCA) have not been extensively elucidated. We aimed to delineate the specific treatment outcomes for this group of patients. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 109 patients with threatened or impending CBS of the ICA/CCA between 2006 and 2023. Patients were categorized into group 1 (no intervention for ICA/CCA,
resultsAge (56.8 ± 8.7 versus 54.3 ± 11.6 versus 56.6 ± 9.2), male sex (39/43 versus 33/36 versus 26/30), tumor size, and type of blowout were similar (
conclusionsIn threatened or impending CBS of the ICA/CCA, prophylactic embolization was associated with a lower risk of recurrent bleeding but a higher risk of acute stroke compared with ICA/CCA stent placement or no intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.