Trial reportInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2025
Randomized Prospective Controlled Open-labeled Trial of Cyclosporine with/without Low-dose Oral Corticosteroids in Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy in Adults with Nephrotic Syndrome.
Trial report in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating rituximab against cyclophosphamide or cyclosporine in idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled, open-label study to investigate the efficacy of a combination of cyclosporine and low-dose prednisolone in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). Methods We recruited biopsy-proven IMN patients with nephrotic syndrome who had never been treated with immunosuppressants. The patients were randomized into 2 groups treated after randomization with cyclosporine (3 mg/kg/day) alone or with an oral low-dose corticosteroid (prednisolone 15 mg/day) for 24 months. Results We recruited 30 patients with IMN and nephrotic-range proteinuria, 28 of whom were included in this study. Fourteen patients were randomized for treatment with only cyclosporine (Group A), and 14 were randomized for treatment with cyclosporine plus low-dose corticosteroids (Group B). Cyclosporine monotherapy induced remission in 12 of the 14 patients in Group A, including partial remission in 7 patients (50.0%) and complete remission in 5 patients (36.7%). In Group B, 12 of 14 patients achieved proteinuria remission, including 11 (78.6%) with complete remission and 1 (7.1%) with partial remission. Although there was no marked difference in the overall remission rate, the complete remission rate was significantly higher in Group B than in Group A (p=0.02). Furthermore, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups in the time from the start of the study to complete remission (10.2±7.8 months in Group A; 9.5±6.1 months in Group B, p=0.03). Conclusion The combination of cyclosporine and low-dose corticosteroid treatment is an effective and important option in the management of patients with IMN with nephrotic-range proteinuria, either as an initial therapy or as a long-term treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.