Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39993435›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy2025

Reversible endoscopic gastroduodenal bypass for the treatment of persistent duodenal leaks after failed surgical repair: a pilot feasibility study.

Kambiz Kadkhodayan, Saurabh Chandan, Artur Viana, Maham Hayat, Natalie Cosgrove, Mustafa A Arain, Deepanshu Jain, Abdullah Abassi, Sagar Pathak, Dennis Yang and 4 more

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kambiz KadkhodayanCenter for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1279-2960
Saurabh ChandanCenter for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, United States.
Artur VianaCenter for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, United States.
Maham HayatCenter for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, United States.
Natalie CosgroveCenter for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, United States.
Mustafa A ArainCenter for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, United States.
Deepanshu JainCenter for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, United States.
Abdullah AbassiCenter for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, United States.
Sagar PathakCenter for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, United States.
Dennis YangCenter for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, United States.
Muhammad Khalid HasanCenter for Interventional Endoscopy, Florida Hospital Orlando, Orlando, United States.
Armando RosalesCenter for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, United States.
Jay RedanCenter for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, United States.
Shayan IraniGastroenterology and Hepatology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Post-surgical leaks following surgical repair of acute duodenal perforations carry high mortality. Reversible endoscopic gastroduodenal bypass (REGB) is a novel procedure that helps divert the acid-rich gastric stream away from the affected duodenum to promote tissue healing at the ulcer site. Methods: REGB is a single-session, two-step procedure involving the creation of an endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastrojejunostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent, followed by endosuturing and closure of the pylorus to achieve complete duodenal bypass. The outcomes of REGB and its reversal were prospectively evaluated in six patients with persistent post-surgical duodenal leaks. Results: REGB was technically successful in all six patients (100%) with no procedure-related adverse events. All patients resumed oral intake within 3 days, experienced significant reductions in surgical drain output, and were discharged. One patient with metastatic breast cancer did not undergo REGB reversal. Among five patients who underwent REGB reversal after a mean of 52.6 days, technical success was achieved in all (100%), with complete healing of duodenal ulcers, absence of leaks on fluoroscopy, and resumption of a solid food diet. Conclusion: REGB is a technically feasible, reversible, and minimally invasive alternative for managing post-surgical duodenal leaks. Further studies are needed to validate its safety and efficacy.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakDuodenumGastric BypassPeptic Ulcer PerforationPostoperative ComplicationsAdultAgedEndosonographyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesStents

Identifiers

PMID39993435
PMCPMC12307041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.