Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39993309›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2025

Leveraging Medical Knowledge Graphs Into Large Language Models for Diagnosis Prediction: Design and Application Study.

Yanjun Gao, Ruizhe Li, Emma Croxford, John Caskey, Brian W Patterson, Matthew Churpek, Timothy Miller, Dmitriy Dligach, Majid Afshar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. LogosKG: Hardware-Optimized Scalable and Interpretable Knowledge Graph Retrieval.Proceedings of the conference. Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yanjun GaoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9341-7360
Ruizhe LiUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2512-845X
Emma CroxfordDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9117-7009
John CaskeyDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5665-524X
Brian W PattersonDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4584-3808
Matthew ChurpekDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4030-5250
Timothy MillerBoston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4513-403X
Dmitriy DligachLoyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2585-2707
Majid AfsharDepartment of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6368-4652

Funding

Research Training for Computation and Informatics in Biology and MedicineT15LM007359 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Mark W. Craven, Colin Noel Dewey · 2002 to 2026
$22.6M
Data Driven Strategies for Substance Misuse Identification in Hospitalized PatientsR01DA051464 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Majid Afshar · 2020 to 2026
$4.5M
Learning Universal Patient Representations with Hierarchical TransformersR01LM012973 · NLM · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI Timothy A Miller · 2019 to 2026
$3.5M
Developing and Evaluating Multi-Modal Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning Models for Automated Diagnosis GenerationR00LM014308 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Yanjun Gao · 2024 to 2026
$726k
Developing and Evaluating Multi-Modal Clinical Diagnostic Reasoning Models for Automated Diagnosis GenerationK99LM014308 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GAO, YANJUN · 2023 to 2023
$87k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA051464NLM NIH HHS K99 LM014308NLM NIH HHS R00 LM014308NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012973NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElectronic health records (EHRs) and routine documentation practices play a vital role in patients' daily care, providing a holistic record of health, diagnoses, and treatment. However, complex and verbose EHR narratives can overwhelm health care providers, increasing the risk of diagnostic inaccuracies. While large language models (LLMs) have showcased their potential in diverse language tasks, their application in health care must prioritize the minimization of diagnostic errors and the prevention of patient harm. Integrating knowledge graphs (KGs) into LLMs offers a promising approach because structured knowledge from KGs could enhance LLMs' diagnostic reasoning by providing contextually relevant medical information.

objectiveThis study introduces DR.KNOWS (Diagnostic Reasoning Knowledge Graph System), a model that integrates Unified Medical Language System-based KGs with LLMs to improve diagnostic predictions from EHR data by retrieving contextually relevant paths aligned with patient-specific information.

methodsDR.KNOWS combines a stack graph isomorphism network for node embedding with an attention-based path ranker to identify and rank knowledge paths relevant to a patient's clinical context. We evaluated DR.KNOWS on 2 real-world EHR datasets from different geographic locations, comparing its performance to baseline models, including QuickUMLS and standard LLMs (Text-to-Text Transfer Transformer and ChatGPT). To assess diagnostic reasoning quality, we designed and implemented a human evaluation framework grounded in clinical safety metrics.

resultsDR.KNOWS demonstrated notable improvements over baseline models, showing higher accuracy in extracting diagnostic concepts and enhanced diagnostic prediction metrics. Prompt-based fine-tuning of Text-to-Text Transfer Transformer with DR.KNOWS knowledge paths achieved the highest ROUGE-L (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation-Longest Common Subsequence) and concept unique identifier F

conclusionsDR.KNOWS offers a robust approach for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and reasoning by integrating structured KG knowledge into LLM-based clinical workflows. Although further work is required to address KG biases and extend generalizability, DR.KNOWS represents progress toward trustworthy artificial intelligence-driven clinical decision support, with a human evaluation framework focused on diagnostic safety and alignment with clinical standards.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencediagnosis predictionelectronic health recordgraph modelknowledge graphlarge language modelmachine learningnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID39993309
PMCPMC11894347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.