Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39993296›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Acceptance Factors and Barriers to the Implementation of a Digital Intervention With Older Adults With Dementia or Caregivers: Protocol for an Umbrella Review.

Ricardo Madeira, Dulce Esteves, Nuno Pinto, Alessandro Vercelli, Maria Vaz Patto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ricardo Madeira *Department of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5011-4709
Dulce Esteves *Department of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6368-2577
Nuno Pinto *RISE Health - Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6605-2407
Alessandro Vercelli *Department of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5909-2128
Maria Vaz Patto *RISE Health - Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0653-3428

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increase in average life expectancy, aging, and the rise in the number of people living with dementia contribute to growing interest from the scientific community. As the disease progresses, people with dementia may need help with most daily activities and need to be supervised by their carer to ensure their safety. With the help of technology, health care provides new means of self-managing health that support active aging, allowing older people and people with dementia to live independently in their homes for a longer period of time. Although some systematic reviews have revealed some of the impacts of using digital interventions in this area, a broad systematic review that examines the overall results of the effect of this intervention type is mandatory.

objectiveThe aim of this review is to further investigate and understand the acceptability and barriers to using technology to monitor and manage health conditions of people living with dementia and their caregivers.

methodsA review of systematic reviews on acceptability factors and barriers for people with dementia and caregivers was carried out. Interventions that assessed acceptability factors and barriers to the use of technology by people with dementia or their carers were included. Each potentially relevant systematic review was assessed in full text by a member of a team of external experts.

resultsThe analysis of the results will be presented in the form of a detailed table of the characteristics of the reviews included. It will also describe the technologies used and factors of acceptability and barriers to their use. The search and preliminary analysis were carried out between May 5, 2023, and August 1, 2024.

conclusionsThis review will play an important role as a comprehensive, evidence-based summary of the barriers and facilitators to the use of digital interventions. This review may help to establish effective policy and clinical guideline recommendations.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaPatient Acceptance of Health CareAgedHumansSystematic Reviews as TopicTelemedicineacceptabilityadherenceagingbarrierscaregiversdementiadigital interventionelderlygeriatricsimplementationmobile applicationsolder peopleself-managementtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39993296
PMCPMC11894341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.