ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2025
Surgical findings and precautions for removing cement that leaked into the spinal canal due to balloon kyphoplasty: illustrative cases.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBalloon kyphoplasty (BKP) is a widely utilized procedure for osteoporotic and metastatic vertebral fractures. However, cement leakage into the spinal canal is a serious complication that can result in neurological deficits, requiring timely and precise surgical intervention. OBSERVATIONS: This report presents two illustrative cases of BKP-related cement leakage. The first case involved a 52-year-old man with a metastatic L3 fracture, in which cement leaked into the spinal canal. Surgical intervention included L2 and L3 laminectomy, resulting in successful cement removal without neurological deficits. The second case involved an 86-year-old man with an L5 osteoporotic burst fracture and cement leakage into the right lateral recess space, causing a unilateral drop foot. An L5 laminectomy performed 3 days later enabled cement removal, although neurological recovery was incomplete, possibly because of nerve compression or thermal injury. In both cases, the cement was brittle and nonadherent to the dura mater, facilitating safe removal. LESSONS: Evaluating cement leakage after cement injection is essential to avoid oversights. Comprehensive preoperative imaging and meticulous planning are crucial due to the variability in cement leakage patterns. Surgical indications and timing require careful consideration, as cement leakage might be asymptomatic in some cases but result in irreversible damage if untreated. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24796.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.