Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39993226›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025

Identifying Patient-Reported Care Experiences in Free-Text Survey Comments: Topic Modeling Study.

Brian Steele, Paul Fairie, Kyle Kemp, Adam G D'Souza, Matthias Wilms, Maria Jose Santana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brian SteeleCentre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Cal Wenzel Precision Health Building, 3280 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada, 1 403-220-5110.ORCID 0000-0002-0081-1079
Paul FairieDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2611-7680
Kyle KempDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0138-5013
Adam G D'SouzaCentre for Health Informatics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Cal Wenzel Precision Health Building, 3280 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada, 1 403-220-5110.ORCID 0000-0002-4270-2065
Matthias WilmsDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8845-360X
Maria Jose SantanaDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0202-5952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patient-reported experience surveys allow administrators, clinicians, and researchers to quantify and improve health care by receiving feedback directly from patients. Existing research has focused primarily on quantitative analysis of survey items, but these measures may collect optional free-text comments. These comments can provide insights for health systems but may not be analyzed due to limited resources and the complexity of traditional textual analysis. However, advances in machine learning-based natural language processing provide opportunities to learn from this traditionally underused data source. Objective: This study aimed to apply natural language processing to model topics found in free-text comments of patient-reported experience surveys. Methods: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems-derived patient experience surveys were collected and linked to administrative inpatient records by the provincial health services organization responsible for inpatient care. Unsupervised topic modeling with automated labeling was performed with BERTopic. Sentiment analysis was performed to further assist in topic description. Results: Between April 2016 and February 2020, 43.4% (43,522/100,272) adult patients and 46.9% (3501/7464) pediatric caregivers included free-text responses on completed patient experience surveys. Topic models identified 86 topics among adult survey responses and 35 topics among pediatric responses that included elements of care not currently surveyed by existing questionnaires. Frequent topics were generally positive. Conclusions: We found that with limited tuning, BERTopic identified care experience topics with interpretable automated labeling. Results are discussed in the context of person-centered care, patient safety, and health care quality improvement. Furthermore, we note the opportunity for the identification of temporal and site-specific trends as a method to identify patient care and safety concerns. As the use of patient experience measurement increases in health care, we discuss how machine learning can be leveraged to provide additional insight on patient experiences.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionAdultChildFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAIartificial intelligenceBERTbidirectional encoder representations from transformersfeedbackinpatientnatural language processingpatient experiencespatient reportedpatient-reported experiencepatient safetypediatric caregiverssafetysentiment analysissurveytopic models

Identifiers

PMID39993226
PMCPMC11875393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.