Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39993188›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Robust encoding of stimulus-response mapping by neurons in visual cortex.

Donatas Jonikaitis, Ruobing Xia, Tirin Moore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cortex-wide Dynamics of Internal Decisions About Behavioral Context.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Sensory reformatting for a working visual memory.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Robust encoding of stimulus-response mapping by neurons in visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Donatas JonikaitisHHMI, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.
Ruobing XiaHHMI, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.
Tirin MooreHHMI, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305.ORCID 0000-0002-3345-2930

Funding

Interaction of Visual and Oculomotor Signals in CortexR01EY014924 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, TIRIN · 2004 to 2024
$7.3M
Large-scale recordings in Primate Prefrontal Cortex: Mechanisms of Value and AttentionRF1NS116623 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, TIRIN, SHENOY, KRISHNA V · 2020 to 2022
$1.8M
Large-scale recordings in Primate Prefrontal Cortex: Mechanisms of Value and AttentionR01NS116623 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, TIRIN, WALLIS, JONI D · 2023 to 2024
$1.0M
Interaction of Visual and Oculomotor Signals in CortexR56EY014924 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, TIRIN · 2009 to 2009
$398k
HHS | NIH | National Eye Institute (NEI) EY014924HHS | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) 116623NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014924NEI NIH HHS R56 EY014924NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS116623NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS116623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural activity in sensory cortex is modulated by behavioral and cognitive factors, and this modulation is thought to contribute to the selection of specific sensory information needed to achieve behavioral goals. In contrast, more abstract behavioral variables that are independent of stimulus selection, such as stimulus-response mapping, are thought to be encoded by neurons outside of sensory cortex. We show that information about such mapping is robustly encoded in the responses of neurons in primate visual cortex. Monkeys were trained to alternate between two tasks that differed in the rule governing the mapping of a remembered visual cue onto an eye movement response. During the memory-delay period, neurons in area V4 reliably signaled the remembered cue location in both tasks. However, the encoding of cue location depended critically on the stimulus-response mapping rule. Thus, V4 delay activity encoded the mapping rule and signaled the preparation of the appropriate motor response rather than spatial working memory per se, contrary to previous assumptions. In addition, we probed the origins of motor-related delay activity and found that it was reduced during local inactivation of the frontal eye field (FEF). The results demonstrate that behavioral modulation of visual cortical activity is not solely related to the selection of sensory stimuli but instead reflects a distinct mechanism for sensory-guided motor output.

Indexed as

CuesEye MovementsNeuronsVisual CortexAnimalsBehavior, AnimalElectrodes, ImplantedEye Movement MeasurementsMacaca mulattaMaleMemory, Short-TermPhotic StimulationSpatial Memoryaffordancecognitionmemorysensorimotor integrationvisuomotor

Identifiers

PMID39993188
PMCPMC11892596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.