Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39993173›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2025

Satisfaction and quality of dying with nonoperative end-of-life care for hospitalized and non-hospitalized frail older patients with (suspected) hip fractures: a combined cohort study.

Miliaan L Zeelenberg, Sverre A I Loggers, Pieter Joosse, Esther M M Van Lieshout, Taco Gosens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miliaan L ZeelenbergTrauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sverre A I LoggersTrauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam; Department of Surgery, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Pieter JoosseDepartment of Surgery, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Esther M M Van LieshoutTrauma Research Unit Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. e.vanlieshout@erasmusmc.nl.
Taco GosensDepartment of Orthopedics, Elisabeth Hospital (ETZ), Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5805-3138

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeFor frail institutionalized hip fracture patients who opt for nonoperative management (NOM), the additional treatment benefits of hospital admission and in-hospital diagnostics are not well evaluated. We aimed to describe and compare treatment satisfaction and quality of dying for patients who refrained from hospitalization after a hip fracture and patients who were treated nonoperatively after a short period of hospitalization.

methodsBoth cohorts included very frail institutionalized hip fracture patients. The first group directly started supportive care in their own nursing home after a suspected hip fracture. The second opted for NOM during shared decision-making after admission and diagnostics at the hospital. Primary outcomes were treatment satisfaction and quality of dying measured by the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire (QODD). Secondary outcomes included health-related quality of life (EuroQoL-5D-5L and Qualidem), pain, and medication.

results20 non-hospitalized and 88 hospitalized patients were included. Overall treatment satisfaction by proxies was high for both the non-hospitalized 9 (interquartile range [IQR] 8-10) and hospitalized patients 8 (IQR 4-9). Quality of dying was rated higher in the non-hospitalized group with QODD 8.3, IQR 6.9-8.6 versus 7.0, IQR 5.7-7.8, and median difference 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1-1.8). Health-related quality of life, measured by the EQ-5D-5L utility score, was low in both groups but higher in non-hospitalized patients (0.30, IQR 0.15-0.32) than in hospitalized patients (0.25, IQR 0.03-0.32, median difference: 0.03, CI -0.03 to 0.09). Both groups reported similar pain levels, but hospitalized patients used higher standardized daily doses of opiates (68 mg vs 39 mg, median difference 24 mg, CI 7-42).

conclusionProxies of hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients report high treatment satisfaction after opting for NOM. Non-hospitalization may have a beneficial effect on quality of dying in selected patients who have pre-recorded do-not-hospitalize directives or shared decision-making after a suspected hip fracture.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyHip FracturesPatient SatisfactionTerminal CareAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39993173
PMCPMC11849162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.