ArticlePloS one2025
Characterization of methane microseepage from natural gas reservoirs in mild climate: A case study of Xinchang gas field.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methane microseepage from oil and gas fields significantly contributes to atmospheric methane level, making it a critical factor in global climate change. Therefore, accurate monitoring of surface flux and investigating migration mechanism are pivotal to evaluating and mitigating the impact of methane microseepage. In this study, methane microseepage from natural gas reservoirs in a mild climate was investigated, using Xinchang gas field as a case study. Soil samples were collected to analyze geochemical anomalies of acid-hydrolyzed hydrocarbons (AHH) and altered carbonates (AC). Surface methane flux from natural gas reservoirs were monitored, using a greenhouse gas analyzer and static gas collection chambers. Methane release patterns and migration mechanism were then discussed. Headspace and soil gas samples were collected to determine the hydrocarbon composition and carbon isotope profile. The results indicate that surface methane flux in Xinchang gas field is weak, exhibiting three release patterns: continuous, episodic, and flat. Spiked anomalies of AHH and AC co-exist in the test area, suggesting methane migration from reservoirs to surface. Hydrocarbon composition and carbon isotope profile in headspace and soil gas samples confirm thermogenic origin of methane. These findings offer new insights into the behavior of methane microseepage from natural gas reservoirs in mild climate. It is also suggested that close monitoring and stringent regulation of methane microseepage, as well as continuous investigation on factors affecting this phenomenon, are essential to the management of geological methane emissions. The conclusions of this work align with previous studies and are applicable to managing methane microseepage from oil and gas reservoirs in a wider scope.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.