Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39992925›Full record

ArticleInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Radical Cystectomy with Elective Indication to Cutaneous Ureterostomy: Single-Center Comparative Analysis Between Open and Robotic Surgery in Frail Patients.

Maria Chiara Sighinolfi, Enrico Panio, Tommaso Calcagnile, Simone Assumma, Filippo Gavi, Luca Sarchi, Matti Sagalli, Filippo Turri, Alberto Romano, Alberto Del Nero and 5 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Telesurgery in Urology is the Hot Topic in this Number of International Brazilian Journal of Urology.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Maria Chiara SighinolfiDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Enrico PanioDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Tommaso CalcagnileDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Simone AssummaDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Filippo GaviDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Luca SarchiDepartment of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Matti SagalliDepartment of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Filippo TurriDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Alberto RomanoDepartment of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Alberto Del NeroDepartment of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Paolo dell'OrtoDepartment of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo and Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Marco SandriBig Data and Statistics, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Andrea GregoriDepartment of Urology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
Franco PalmisanoDepartment of Urology, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
Bernardo RoccoDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesRadical cystectomy (RC) is a surgical procedure associated with high rates of morbidity. The aim of the study is to provide a comparison between robotic (RARC) and open RC (ORC) in patients elected to cutaneous ureterostomy (CUS). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis is a retrospective single-center cohort study performed at a high-volume institution. The study involved 64 patients undergoing RC with CUS, 42 ORC and 22 RARC. The indication for RC was based on EAU guidelines and the choice of CUS was planned due to advanced oncological stage or patient's frailty. Patient allocation to the robotic or open approach for RC was casual, determined by surgeon preference and/or the availability of a robotic operating room. The Adverse events were systematically graded utilizing the Clavien-Dindo classification system.

resultsComplications of Clavien Dindo ≥ 2 occurred in 27 out of 42 (64.2%) ORC and 3/22 (13.6%) RARC (p < 0.001); complications of Clavien Dindo ≥ 3 occurred in 10/42 (23.8%) ORC and only 1/22 (4.5%) RARC, respectively (p = 0.08). Multivariable analysis revealed that robotic surgery was the only variable inversely associated with Clavien Dindo ≤ 2 complications.

conclusionsIn conclusion, RARC appears to be associated with lower morbidity and reduced incidence of complications, elements that make it particularly suitable for frail patients with an elective indication for CUS.

Indexed as

CystectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresUreterostomyUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleFrail ElderlyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCystectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresUreterostomy

Identifiers

PMID39992925
PMCPMC12052034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.