Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39992919›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Optimizing Bi-LSTM networks for improved lung cancer detection accuracy.

Su Diao, Yajie Wan, Danyi Huang, Shijia Huang, Touseef Sadiq, Mohammad Shahbaz Khan, Lal Hussain, Badr S Alkahtani, Tehseen Mazhar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Su DiaoDepartment of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States of America.
Yajie WanDepartment of Computer Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.
Danyi HuangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States of America.
Shijia HuangFu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science, Fu Foundation School of Engineering and Applied Science, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States of America.
Touseef SadiqDepartment of Information and Communication Technology, Centre for Artificial Intelligence Research (CAIR), University of Agder, Grimstad, Norway.
Mohammad Shahbaz KhanChildren's National Hospital, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Lal HussainDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, The University of Azad Jammu and Kashmir, Chattar Kalas Campus, Muzaffarabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-1103-4938
Badr S AlkahtaniDepartment of Mathematics, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Tehseen MazharSchool of Computer Science, National College of Business Administration and Economics, Lahore, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with low survival rates often attributed to late-stage diagnosis. To address this critical health challenge, researchers have developed computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems that rely on feature extraction from medical images. However, accurately identifying the most informative image features for lung cancer detection remains a significant challenge. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of both hand-crafted and deep learning-based approaches for lung cancer diagnosis. We employed traditional hand-crafted features, such as Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) features, in conjunction with traditional machine learning algorithms. To explore the potential of deep learning, we also optimized and implemented a Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) network for lung cancer detection. The results revealed that the highest performance using hand-crafted features was achieved by extracting GLCM features and utilizing Support Vector Machine (SVM) with different kernels, reaching an accuracy of 99.78% and an AUC of 0.999. However, the deep learning Bi-LSTM network surpassed both methods, achieving an accuracy of 99.89% and an AUC of 1.0000. These findings suggest that the proposed methodology, combining hand-crafted features and deep learning, holds significant promise for enhancing early lung cancer detection and ultimately improving diagnosis systems.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, Computer-AssistedLung NeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansMachine LearningSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID39992919
PMCPMC11849851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.