ArticlePloS one2025
Optimizing Bi-LSTM networks for improved lung cancer detection accuracy.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimized Machine Learning Pipeline for Lung Cancer Classification: Feature Reduction and Hyperparameter Tuning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Gene-based lung cancer detection system through omix data and optimized convolutional neural network.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Cancer and Aging Biomarkers: Classification, Early Detection Technologies and Emerging Research Trends.Biosensors · 2025Review
- An enhanced fusion of transfer learning models with optimization based clinical diagnosis of lung and colon cancer using biomedical imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with low survival rates often attributed to late-stage diagnosis. To address this critical health challenge, researchers have developed computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems that rely on feature extraction from medical images. However, accurately identifying the most informative image features for lung cancer detection remains a significant challenge. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of both hand-crafted and deep learning-based approaches for lung cancer diagnosis. We employed traditional hand-crafted features, such as Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) features, in conjunction with traditional machine learning algorithms. To explore the potential of deep learning, we also optimized and implemented a Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) network for lung cancer detection. The results revealed that the highest performance using hand-crafted features was achieved by extracting GLCM features and utilizing Support Vector Machine (SVM) with different kernels, reaching an accuracy of 99.78% and an AUC of 0.999. However, the deep learning Bi-LSTM network surpassed both methods, achieving an accuracy of 99.89% and an AUC of 1.0000. These findings suggest that the proposed methodology, combining hand-crafted features and deep learning, holds significant promise for enhancing early lung cancer detection and ultimately improving diagnosis systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.