ArticlePloS one2025
Combined immunoinformatic approaches with computational biochemistry for development of subunit-based vaccine against Lawsonia intracellularis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-driven discovery in protein science for immunology and infectious disease research.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lawsonia intracellularis (LI) are obligate intracellular bacteria and the causative agent of proliferative hemorrhagic enteropathy that significantly impacts the health of piglets and the profitability of the swine industry. In this study, we used immunoinformatic and computational methodologies such as homology modelling, molecular docking, molecular dynamic (MD) simulation, and free energy calculations in a novel three stage approach to identify strong T and B cell epitopes in the LI proteome. From ∼ 1342 LI proteins, we narrowed our focus to 256 proteins that were either not well-identified (unknown role) or were expressed at a higher frequency in pathogenic strains relative to non-pathogenic strains. At stage 1, these proteins were analyzed for predicted virulence, antigenicity, solubility, and probability of residing within a membrane. At stage 2, we used NetMHCPan4-1 to identify over ten thousand cytotoxic T lymphocyte epitopes (CTLEs) and 286 CTLEs were ranked as having high predicted binding affinity for the SLA-1 and SLA-2 complexes. At stage 3, we used homology modeling to predict the structures of the top ranked CTLEs and we subjected each of them to molecular docking analysis with SLA-1*0401 and SLA-2*0402. The top ranked 25 SLA-CTLE complexes were selected to be an input for subsequent MD simulations to fully investigate the atomic-level dynamics of proteins under the natural thermal fluctuation of water and thus potentially provide deep insight into the CTLE-SLA interaction. We also performed free energy evaluation by Molecular Mechanics/Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area to predict epitope interactions and binding affinities to the SLA-1 and SLA-2. We identified the top five CTLEs having the strongest binding energy to the indicated SLAs (-305.6 kJ/mol, -219.5 kJ/mol, -214.8 kJ/mol, -139.5 kJ/mol and -92.6 kJ/mol, respectively.) W also performed B-cell epitope prediction and the top-ranked 5 CTLEs and 3 B-cell epitopes were organized into a multi-epitope subunit antigen vaccine construct joined using EAAAK, AAY, KK, and GGGGG linkers with 40 residues of the LI DnaK protein attached to the N-terminus to further enhance the antigenicity of the vaccine construct. Blind docking studies showed strong interactions between our vaccine construct with swine Toll-like receptor 5. Collectively, these molecular modeling and immunoinformatic analyses present a useful in silico protocol for the discovery of candidate antigen in many viral and bacterial pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.