Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39992891›Full record

ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2025

Evaluation of nursing care delivery methods using in a university hospital: a qualitative study.

Nermin Uyurdağ, Seyhan Çerçi, Satı Birbudak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nermin UyurdağDicle University Atatürk Health Services Vocational School, Diyarbakır, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5838-3057
Seyhan ÇerçiArel University Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1370-9604
Satı BirbudakDr. Siyami Ersek Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4187-0833

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study evaluates a university hospital's nursing care delivery methods.

methodThe population of the study, which was conducted using a qualitative research design and phenomenological approach, consisted of all charge nurses working in a state university hospital (n = 39). The sample was determined to reflect maximum diversity (n = 15). Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a semi-structured interview form. Description, analysis, and content analysis were performed using the MAXQDA software package. Codes, sub-themes, and themes were created. Necessary permissions were obtained prior to the research.

resultsThe research data were grouped under five themes: the care delivery method used, the decision to use the care delivery method, the decision to use the care delivery method in case of disaster or crisis, the impact of the care delivery method on outcomes, and care delivery method training. A total of 13 sub-themes related to the themes were identified.

conclusionIt was found that there is no standard structure in the care delivery method, and nurses do not have training.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareNursing CareNursing Staff, HospitalAdultFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID39992891
PMCPMC11849808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.