Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39992743›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2025

Improving the User Interface and Guiding the Development of Effective Training Material for a Clinical Research Recruitment and Retention Dashboard: Usability Testing Study.

Leah Leslie Gardner, Pezhman Raeisian Parvari, Mark Seidman, Richard J Holden, Nicole R Fowler, Ben L Zarzaur, Diana Summanwar, Cristina Barboi, Malaz Boustani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leah Leslie GardnerCenter for Health Innovation and Implementation Science, School of Medicine, Indiana University, 410 W 10th St #1140, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, United States, 1 (317) 274-8536.ORCID 0009-0005-3883-6393
Pezhman Raeisian ParvariCenter for Health Innovation and Implementation Science, School of Medicine, Indiana University, 410 W 10th St #1140, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, United States, 1 (317) 274-8536.ORCID 0009-0007-5675-2737
Mark SeidmanCenter for Health Innovation and Implementation Science, School of Medicine, Indiana University, 410 W 10th St #1140, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, United States, 1 (317) 274-8536.ORCID 0009-0000-5469-8342
Richard J HoldenCenter for Health Innovation and Implementation Science, School of Medicine, Indiana University, 410 W 10th St #1140, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, United States, 1 (317) 274-8536.ORCID 0000-0002-3603-6158
Nicole R FowlerCenter for Health Innovation and Implementation Science, School of Medicine, Indiana University, 410 W 10th St #1140, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, United States, 1 (317) 274-8536.ORCID 0000-0002-6465-0008
Ben L ZarzaurDepartment of Surgery, Division of Acute Care and Regional General Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9988-9572
Diana SummanwarDepartment of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7529-3632
Cristina BarboiDepartment of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8356-7285
Malaz BoustaniCenter for Health Innovation and Implementation Science, School of Medicine, Indiana University, 410 W 10th St #1140, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, United States, 1 (317) 274-8536.ORCID 0000-0003-0330-677X

Funding

The Agile Nudge University ProgramR25AG078136 · NIA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI MALAZ BOUSTANI, Richard J Holden · 2022 to 2026
$715k
NIA NIH HHS R25 AG078136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Participant recruitment and retention are critical to the success of clinical trials, yet challenges such as low enrollment rates and high attrition remain ongoing obstacles. RecruitGPS is a scalable dashboard with integrated control charts to address these issues by providing real-time data monitoring and analysis, enabling researchers to better track and improve recruitment and retention. Objective: This study aims to identify the challenges and inefficiencies users encounter when interacting with the RecruitGPS dashboard. By identifying these issues, the study aims to inform strategies for improving the dashboard's user interface and create targeted, effective instructional materials that address user needs. Methods: Twelve clinical researchers from the Midwest region of the United States provided feedback through a 10-minute, video-recorded usability test session, during which participants were instructed to explore the various tabs of the dashboard, identify challenges, and note features that worked well while thinking aloud. Following the video session, participants took a survey on which they answered System Usability Scale (SUS) questions, ease of navigation questions, and a Net Promoter Score (NPS) question. Results: A quantitative analysis of survey responses revealed an average SUS score of 61.46 (SD 23.80; median 66.25) points, indicating a need for improvement in the user interface. The NPS was 8, with 4 of 12 (33%) respondents classified as promoters and 3 of 12 (25%) as detractors, indicating a slightly positive satisfaction. When participants compared RecruitGPS to other recruitment and study management tools they had used, 8 of 12 (67%) of participants rated RecruitGPS as better or much better. Only 1 of 12 (8%) participants rated RecruitGPS as worse but not much worse. A qualitative analysis of participants' interactions with the dashboard diagnosed a confusing part of the dashboard that could be eliminated or made optional and provided valuable insight for the development of instructional videos and documentation. Participants liked the dashboard's data visualization capabilities, including intuitive graphs and trend tracking; progress indicators, such as color-coded status indicators and comparison metrics; and the overall dashboard's layout and design, which consolidated relevant data on a single page. Users also valued the accuracy and real-time updates of data, especially the integration with external sources like Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap). Conclusions: RecruitGPS demonstrates significant potential to improve the efficiency of clinical trials by providing researchers with real-time insights into participant recruitment and retention. This study offers valuable recommendations for targeted refinements to enhance the user experience and maximize the dashboard's effectiveness. Additionally, it highlights navigation challenges that can be addressed through the development of clear and focused instructional videos.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchClinical Trials as TopicPatient SelectionResearch PersonnelUser-Computer InterfaceAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesagile implementationagile scienceclinical researchhuman-computer interactionrecruitment strategiesresearch subject recruitment

Identifiers

PMID39992743
PMCPMC11875103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.