Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39992655›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Tetramethylpyrazine Nitrone in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Xiaolu Liu, Huifang Shang, Qianqian Wei, Xiaoli Yao, Ling Lian, Jingxia Dang, Rui Jia, Zhiying Wu, Hongfu Li, Qi Niu and 13 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Xiaolu LiuDepartment of Neurology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Huifang ShangDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China.
Qianqian WeiDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Sichuan, China.
Xiaoli YaoDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ling LianDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jingxia DangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xian, China.
Rui JiaDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xian, China.
Zhiying WuDepartment of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Hongfu LiDepartment of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Qi NiuDepartment of Neurology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Xi ChengDepartment of Neurology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Zhangyu ZouDepartment of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Sheng ChenDepartment of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Min ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Neurology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yaling LiuDepartment of Neurology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Qi LiuDepartment of Neurology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xusheng HuangDepartment of Neurology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hongfen WangDepartment of Neurology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Honglin FengDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Shuyu WangDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
Dongsheng FanDepartment of Neurology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
TBNALS group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Tetramethylpyrazine nitrone has exhibited promising results in improving motor dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of orally administered tetramethylpyrazine nitrone in patients with ALS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 2, multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 24, 2020, through July 14, 2023, in 11 centers in China, with a 180-day follow-up. Patients aged 45 to 70 years, with ALS onset within 2 years, ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores of at least 2 points on each item, and forced vital capacity (FVC) of at least 80% were included. Patients experienced a 1- to 4-point decrease in ALSFRS-R score during a 3-month screening period. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive low-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone (600 mg twice daily), high-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone (1200 mg twice daily), or placebo (twice daily) for 180 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in ALSFRS-R score (range of 0-48, with lower scores indicating worse function) from baseline to 180 days. The secondary outcomes were changes in FVC, grip strength, ALS Assessment Questionnaire-40 (ALSAQ-40) score, and end point events. Safety outcomes included adverse events. Results: A total of 155 patients (mean [SD] age, 55.0 [6.5] years; 115 men [74.2%]) were randomized (51 [32.9%] to the low-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone group, 52 [33.6%] to the high-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone group, and 52 [33.6%] to the placebo group). No significant differences were observed in ALSFRS-R score changes between low-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone (least squares [LS] mean difference, -0.89 points; 95% CI -3.25 to 1.48 points) and high-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone (LS mean difference, -0.20 points; 95% CI -2.48 to 2.07 points) compared with placebo. High-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone showed a significantly slower decline in grip strength at day 180 (LS mean difference, 2.46 kg; 95% CI, 0.15-4.76 kg). In a subgroup of patients younger than 65 years with slower disease progression, tetramethylpyrazine nitrone significantly attenuated the decline in grip strength (LS mean difference, 3.63 kg; 95% CI, 0.84-6.41 kg), bulbar scores (LS mean difference, 0.66 points; 95% CI, 0.03-1.29 points), and respiratory scores (LS mean difference, 0.54 points; 95% CI, 0.03-1.06 points). Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate, with no severe treatment-related adverse events or deaths. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial demonstrates that tetramethylpyrazine nitrone is safe and well-tolerated in patients with ALS. There was no difference in the primary end point across the low-dose, high-dose, and placebo groups, with significant benefits in a subgroup of younger patients with slower disease progression. Trial Registration: ChiCTR Identifier: ChiCTR2000039689.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisPyrazinesAgedChinaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomePyrazinestetramethylpyrazine

Identifiers

PMID39992655
PMCPMC11851239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.