Trial reportJAMA network open2025
Tetramethylpyrazine Nitrone in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tetramethylpyrazine modulates the Nrf2/JNK axis to intervene in ferroptosis and neuroinflammation after spinal cord injury: an integrated perspective from antioxidant to regenerative therapy.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Traditional Chinese botanical medicines and plant-derived bioactive compounds in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: mechanistic evidence, translational challenges, and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in Mainland China: clinical translational challenges and opportunities.Current opinion in neurology · 2025Review
- Review
- From a traditional medicine monomer to a modern neurotherapeutic scaffold: a review of SAR-Driven tetramethylpyrazine derivatives for cerebrovascular and cognitive health.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Tetramethylpyrazine nitrone has exhibited promising results in improving motor dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of orally administered tetramethylpyrazine nitrone in patients with ALS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This phase 2, multicenter, double-masked, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted from December 24, 2020, through July 14, 2023, in 11 centers in China, with a 180-day follow-up. Patients aged 45 to 70 years, with ALS onset within 2 years, ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R) scores of at least 2 points on each item, and forced vital capacity (FVC) of at least 80% were included. Patients experienced a 1- to 4-point decrease in ALSFRS-R score during a 3-month screening period. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive low-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone (600 mg twice daily), high-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone (1200 mg twice daily), or placebo (twice daily) for 180 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was change in ALSFRS-R score (range of 0-48, with lower scores indicating worse function) from baseline to 180 days. The secondary outcomes were changes in FVC, grip strength, ALS Assessment Questionnaire-40 (ALSAQ-40) score, and end point events. Safety outcomes included adverse events. Results: A total of 155 patients (mean [SD] age, 55.0 [6.5] years; 115 men [74.2%]) were randomized (51 [32.9%] to the low-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone group, 52 [33.6%] to the high-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone group, and 52 [33.6%] to the placebo group). No significant differences were observed in ALSFRS-R score changes between low-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone (least squares [LS] mean difference, -0.89 points; 95% CI -3.25 to 1.48 points) and high-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone (LS mean difference, -0.20 points; 95% CI -2.48 to 2.07 points) compared with placebo. High-dose tetramethylpyrazine nitrone showed a significantly slower decline in grip strength at day 180 (LS mean difference, 2.46 kg; 95% CI, 0.15-4.76 kg). In a subgroup of patients younger than 65 years with slower disease progression, tetramethylpyrazine nitrone significantly attenuated the decline in grip strength (LS mean difference, 3.63 kg; 95% CI, 0.84-6.41 kg), bulbar scores (LS mean difference, 0.66 points; 95% CI, 0.03-1.29 points), and respiratory scores (LS mean difference, 0.54 points; 95% CI, 0.03-1.06 points). Adverse events were mostly mild or moderate, with no severe treatment-related adverse events or deaths. Conclusions and Relevance: This randomized clinical trial demonstrates that tetramethylpyrazine nitrone is safe and well-tolerated in patients with ALS. There was no difference in the primary end point across the low-dose, high-dose, and placebo groups, with significant benefits in a subgroup of younger patients with slower disease progression. Trial Registration: ChiCTR Identifier: ChiCTR2000039689.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.