ArticleJAMA neurology2025
Detection of Epileptogenic Focal Cortical Dysplasia Using Graph Neural Networks: A MELD Study.
Article in JAMA neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based detection of focal cortical dysplasia in children: External validation of the MELD Graph and 3D-nnUNet pipelines.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Volume-inflation registration (INFREG) for morphometric analysis of human focal cortical dysplasia type II.iScience · 2026Article
- Quantifying extra-lesional interhemispheric cortical asymmetry in focal cortical dysplasia type II.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- New waves in psychiatric neuroimaging.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- Comparison of volume- and surface-based magnetic resonance imaging morphometry algorithms in the detection of focal cortical dysplasia.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- Characterizing Onset Limit and Surgical Outcome Factors in Type II Focal Cortical Dysplasia-Related Epilepsy.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in paediatric neuroradiology: current landscape, challenges, and future directions.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Enhanced detection of subtle cortical abnormalities in focal epilepsy using 7 T MRI surface-based models and graph neural networks.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence That Changes Clinical Neurology Practice: Translating Algorithms Into Actionable Care.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Review
- Thalamo-Lesional Connectivity Signatures of Bilateral Tonic-Clonic Seizures in Focal Cortical Dysplasia-Related Epilepsy.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026Article
- Surgical resection as salvage therapy for super-refractory status epilepticus: a report of two cases.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2026Article
- Surgical outcomes for superior frontal sulcus focal cortical dysplasia-related epilepsy.Seizure · 2026Article
- Pipeline evaluation of a state-of-the-art AI algorithm for detection of focal cortical dysplasia: insights into potential failure sources.Brain informatics · 2026Article
- Deep learning in fetal, infant, and toddler neuroimaging research.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Review
- AI in epilepsy neuroimaging.Current opinion in neurology · 2026Review
- Review
- AI enabled decision support systems in epilepsy surgery a scoping review.Research square · 2026Article
- MICAFlow: Fast and robust MRI preprocessing bridging research neuroimaging and clinical practice.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Twenty years of frontal lobe surgery: Clinical outcomes and lessons from the frontier.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
- Deep learning enabled decision support systems in epilepsy surgery: a scoping review.npj health systems · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byBeyond the2026
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
51 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: A leading cause of surgically remediable, drug-resistant focal epilepsy is focal cortical dysplasia (FCD). FCD is challenging to visualize and often considered magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) negative. Existing automated methods for FCD detection are limited by high numbers of false-positive predictions, hampering their clinical utility. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and interpretability of graph neural networks in automatically detecting FCD lesions on MRI scans. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this multicenter diagnostic study, retrospective MRI data were collated from 23 epilepsy centers worldwide between 2018 and 2022, as part of the Multicenter Epilepsy Lesion Detection (MELD) Project, and analyzed in 2023. Data from 20 centers were split equally into training and testing cohorts, with data from 3 centers withheld for site-independent testing. A graph neural network (MELD Graph) was trained to identify FCD on surface-based features. Network performance was compared with an existing algorithm. Feature analysis, saliencies, and confidence scores were used to interpret network predictions. In total, 34 surface-based MRI features and manual lesion masks were collated from participants, 703 patients with FCD-related epilepsy and 482 controls, and 57 participants were excluded during MRI quality control. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of automatically identified lesions. Results: In the test dataset, the MELD Graph had a sensitivity of 81.6% in histopathologically confirmed patients seizure-free 1 year after surgery and 63.7% in MRI-negative patients with FCD. The PPV of putative lesions from the 260 patients in the test dataset (125 female [48%] and 135 male [52%]; mean age, 18.0 [IQR, 11.0-29.0] years) was 67% (70% sensitivity; 60% specificity), compared with 39% (67% sensitivity; 54% specificity) using an existing baseline algorithm. In the independent test cohort (116 patients; 62 female [53%] and 54 male [47%]; mean age, 22.5 [IQR, 13.5-27.5] years), the PPV was 76% (72% sensitivity; 56% specificity), compared with 46% (77% sensitivity; 47% specificity) using the baseline algorithm. Interpretable reports characterize lesion location, size, confidence, and salient features. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, the MELD Graph represented a state-of-the-art, openly available, and interpretable tool for FCD detection on MRI scans with significant improvements in PPV. Its clinical implementation holds promise for early diagnosis and improved management of focal epilepsy, potentially leading to better patient outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.