ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2025
Artificial Intelligence-Based Uveitis Diagnosis Through Retinal Vasculature Analysis: A Paradigm Shift in Ocular Tuberculosis.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retinalysis-Vascx: An Explainable Software Toolbox for the Extraction of Retinal Vascular Biomarkers From Color Fundus Images.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Explainable retinal deep learning for cardiovascular risk stratification: a multiple modality analysis framework with vascular-centric interpretability and robustness.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- A Systematic Approach to Managing Acute Visual Loss: A Comprehensive Review of Literature.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDiagnosis of uveitis is complex and often requires a series of investigations. Here, we utilize artificial intelligence (AI) for the quantitative analysis of retinal vasculature parameters from fundus photographs to differentiate confirmed ocular tuberculosis (TB) from QuantiFERON (QFT)-positive uveitis without another identifiable cause and ocular toxoplasmosis.
methodsMedical records and stored fundus images of patients with uveitis from a cohort at the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Indonesia, were analyzed. Three groups of patients were included: confirmed ocular TB (group A), QFT-positive uveitis (group B), and ocular toxoplasmosis (group C). Fundus images were processed using the Retinalysis models package for segmentation and quantification of retinal vasculature parameters.
resultsThe study included nine patients (13 eyes) in group A, 38 patients (48 eyes) in group B, and 26 patients (39 eyes) in group C. Significant differences were found in vein tortuosity parameter, in the eyes within group A showing lower tortuosity score compared to eyes within group B (p = 0.030) and group C (p = 0.013). The area under the curve (AUC) of vein tortuosity for group A compared to group B was 0.749 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.606-0.892), with a sensitivity of 67.3% and specificity of 76.9%. The AUC of vein tortuosity for group A against group C was 0.803 (95% CI: 0.658-0.948), with a sensitivity of 74.4% and a specificity of 84.6%. In group A, uveitis resolution and vein tortuosity tended to be normalized upon complete antitubercular treatment.
conclusionsAI-based quantification of retinal vasculature parameters, particularly vein tortuosity, can differentiate confirmed ocular TB from QFT-positive uveitis and ocular toxoplasmosis. This approach shows promise for more precise diagnostic and therapeutic accuracy in ocular TB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.