Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39992583›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2025

Beyond human perception: challenges in AI interpretability of orangutan artwork.

Cédric Sueur, Elliot Maitre, Jimmy Falck, Masaki Shimada, Marie Pelé

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cédric SueurUniversité de Strasbourg, IPHC, CNRS, UMR 7178, 67000, Strasbourg, France. cedric.sueur@iphc.cnrs.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8206-2739
Elliot MaitreUniversité de Toulouse - IRIT UMR5505, 31400, Toulouse, France.
Jimmy FalckLaboratoire Lorrain de Recherche en Informatique et ses Applications, (Loria - CNRS/Université de Lorraine/Inria), Nancy, France.
Masaki ShimadaDepartment of Animal Sciences, Teikyo University of Science, Uenohara Yamanashi, Yatsusawa, 2525409-0193, Japan.
Marie PeléANTHROPO-LAB - ETHICS EA 7446, Université Catholique de Lille, 59000, Lille, France.

Funding

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique IRP Comp²ACentre National de la Recherche Scientifique MITICentre National de la Recherche Scientifique PNRIA2023Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 20H01409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drawings serve as a profound medium of expression for both humans and apes, offering unique insights into the cognitive and emotional landscapes of the artists, regardless of their species. This study employs artificial intelligence (AI), specifically Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and the interpretability tool Captum, to analyse non-figurative drawings by Molly, an orangutan. The research utilizes VGG19 and ResNet18 models to decode seasonal nuances in the drawings, achieving notable accuracy in seasonal classification and revealing complex influences beyond human-centric methods. Techniques, such as occlusion, integrated gradients, PCA, t-SNE, and Louvain clustering, highlight critical areas and elements influencing seasonal recognition, providing deeper insights into the drawings. This approach not only advances the analysis of non-human art but also demonstrates the potential of AI to enrich our understanding of non-human cognitive and emotional expressions, with significant implications for fields like evolutionary anthropology and comparative psychology.

Indexed as

ArtArtificial IntelligencePongoPongo pygmaeusAnimalsCognitionFemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerApesDeep learningExplainabilityNon-human primatesPrimatology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.