Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39992534›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2025

Higher target attainment for B-lactam antibiotics in patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infections when four times actual minimum inhibitory concentrations and epidemiological cutoff values are applied compared to clinical breakpoints.

Ilja Areskog Lejbman, Gustav Torisson, Fredrik Resman, Fredrik Sjövall

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Optimal antibiotic use in the intensive care unit.Critical care (London, England) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ilja Areskog LejbmanDepartment of Intensive and Perioperative Care, Skåne University Hospital, Carl-Bertil Laurells gata 9, Malmö, 205 02, Sweden. ilja.areskog_lejbman@med.lu.se.
Gustav TorissonDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Fredrik ResmanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Fredrik SjövallDepartment of Intensive and Perioperative Care, Skåne University Hospital, Carl-Bertil Laurells gata 9, Malmö, 205 02, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBeta-lactam antibiotics are essential in the treatment of Gram-negative bloodstream infections. The effect of beta-lactam antibiotics depends on the time of unbound antibiotic concentration above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). An antibiotic concentration above MIC during the whole dosing interval (100% ƒT > MIC) has been suggested as a target for severe infections. The aim of the present study was to compare target attainment using targets derived from known MICs with standard generic targets.

methodsIn this prospective, single-center study, adult patients with Gram-negative bloodstream infection treated with cefotaxime, piperacillin/tazobactam or meropenem were eligible for inclusion. Trough antibiotic concentrations were collected during a single dosing interval and actual MIC values for the antimicrobial agent against the infecting isolate were obtained using E-tests. Epidemiological cut off values, ECOFFs, were applied from European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, EUCAST, tables for isolates within the wild-type distribution. Antibiotic concentrations were measured using Liquid Chromatography tandem Mass Spectrometry. Free concentrations were estimated based on total concentrations. Two targets based on actual MICs were assessed: free trough concentrations above (1) four times the actual MIC (100% ƒT > 4MIC) or above (2) the ECOFF (100% ƒT > ECOFF). Proportions of target attainment for the MIC-based targets were compared with attainment using clinical breakpoints or PK/PD breakpoints. Treatment response was defined as clinical resolution at day 7 (No persisting signs or symptoms of infection).

resultsWe included 98 patients with a median age of 72 years. The most common microbiological finding was Escherichia coli (63%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (12%). Of all patients, 77/98 patients (79%) attained 100% ƒT > 4MIC and 80/98 (82%) attained 100% ƒT > ECOFF, compared with 57/98 (58%) using 100% ƒT > EUCAST clinical breakpoints. Clinical resolution at day 7 was significantly associated with target attainment applying the target 100% ƒT > 4MIC (p = 0.013), but this was not the case when 100% ƒT > ECOFF was applied (p = 0.50).

conclusionsIn our material, higher target attainment rates were seen using targets derived from actual MICs, compared to EUCAST clinical breakpoints. Attaining 100% ƒT > 4MIC was associated with resolution of infection, but the latter finding should be interpreted cautiously.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiabeta-LactamsGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMeropenemMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamsMeropenemBeta-lactam antibioticsECOFFsEUCAST clinical breakpointsGram-negative bacteremiaMICPK/PDSepsis

Identifiers

PMID39992534
PMCPMC12062050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.