Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39992483›Full record

ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2025

Association between electronic cigarette use and respiratory outcomes among people with no established smoking history: a comprehensive review and critical appraisal.

Arielle Selya, Giusy Rita Maria La Rosa, Lucia Spicuzza, Jaymin B Morjaria, Grazia Caci, Riccardo Polosa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arielle SelyaPinney Associates, Inc., 201 N. Craig St. Suite 320, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Giusy Rita Maria La RosaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Lucia SpicuzzaCenter of Excellence for the Acceleration of HArm Reduction (CoEHAR), University of Catania, Via S. Sofia, 78-Ed. 4, P. 2, 95123, Catania, Italy.
Jaymin B MorjariaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Harefield Hospital, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield, UK.
Grazia CaciUOC MCAU, University Teaching Hospital "Policlinico-S. Marco", University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Riccardo PolosaCenter of Excellence for the Acceleration of HArm Reduction (CoEHAR), University of Catania, Via S. Sofia, 78-Ed. 4, P. 2, 95123, Catania, Italy. polosa@unict.it.ORCID 0000-0002-8450-5721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nicotine consumption in many countries is shifting away from combustible cigarettes and toward electronic cigarettes (ECs). Understanding the overall population-level impact requires weighing their possible benefits (e.g., for smoking cessation/switching) vs harms (e.g., long-term health risks). However, current evidence on health risks is limited by the absence of long-term data and confounding by prior cigarette smoking history. Focusing on short- to medium-term respiratory outcomes associated with EC use among people who never smoked (PWNS) is informative. We perform a narrative review and critical appraisal of studies examining the prospective association between exclusive EC use and respiratory outcomes among PWNS (either true never-smoking or never-established smoking). We included 12 studies with prospective designs that examine a range of respiratory outcomes subsequent to EC use among PWNS. Eight studies did not find statistically significant differences in respiratory risk associated with baseline EC use. The remaining five studies reported a significant association in at least one analysis, but in four of these studies, associations were not robust across models. Limitations included overreliance on data from the U.S. Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health, uncertain directionality (i.e., pre-existing respiratory conditions were not always ruled out), confounding by other combustible tobacco use, and small sample sizes. All but one study lacked clear and statistically significant evidence of self-reported respiratory diagnoses associated with EC use among PWNS, or showed a tenuous association with mild respiratory symptoms. This has favorable implications for ECs' population health impact; however, small sample sizes and statistical biases limit this evidence. A formal systematic review on this topic is forthcoming.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsVapingHumansSmokingAsthmaChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseElectronic cigarettesNever-smokingRespiratory illnessRespiratory symptoms

Identifiers

PMID39992483
PMCPMC12009221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.