ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2025
Hip fractures in older patients: analysing the activity of an orthopaedic department to design an optimized pathway of fracture care.
Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Substandard management of hip fractures in older patients has serious consequences in outcomes. Assessing care provided and institutional characteristics is essential to identify aspects to improve for better results. Delay to surgery, inadequate pain management, and delay in urinary catheter removal were especially inadequate and needed correction to better patient recovery.
introductionHip fractures in older patients are a public health issue due to their prevalence and consequences. This study is an assessment of treatment currently provided to older patients with hip fractures in a tertiary hospital as a way of measuring standard care and guiding the design of a hospital-specific care pathway for the treatment of these patients.
methodsA total of 250 patients over 65 years old were analysed. The overall population and its subgroups (early or late surgery and admitted to orthopaedic or non-orthopaedic ward) were characterized through descriptive statistical analysis, and the results were compared through inferential and regression analysis.
resultsAspects requiring improvement were identified: inadequate pain management in the emergency department, increased time to surgery, excessive length of stay, increased time to first ambulation and to urinary catheter removal, medical complications and decrease in functional capacity at discharge. The mortality rate at discharge and up to 6 months was similar to what is described in the literature, in spite of the issues identified. Although further analysis is needed, some empirical reasons for these results are proposed. DISCUSSION: Some of the results described can be attributed to common hospital characteristics or non-modifiable patient characteristics but others can be corrected by suitable interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39992449What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.