ArticleJournal of molecular modeling2025
Theoretical study of the formation of inclusion complexes with some terpenes using different solvating models.
Article in Journal of molecular modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextEssential oil molecules have various nutritional and medical uses. However, their applications are limited by their low polarity and high volatility. Inclusion complexes provide a way to overcome these limitations. Cyclodextrins are cyclic oligosaccharides composed of macrocyclic rings of glucose units linked by α-1,4 glycosidic bonds, which are used to prepare inclusion complexes with essential oils. Experiments on the formation of inclusion complexes show that essential oil molecules can bind to cyclodextrins in various ways. Electronic structure calculations help to understand why some essential oil molecules bind more effectively than others in the formation of inclusion complexes with cyclodextrins.
methodsOur study employed theoretical calculations to investigate the interaction between beta-cyclodextrin and six essential oil molecules. The selected essential oil molecules were carvacrol, carvone, eugenol, limonene, p-cymene, and thymol. Molecular docking between the essential oil molecules and cyclodextrin resulted in both complexed structures and non-complexed structures, with some molecules positioned outside the cyclodextrin cavity. The interaction energies, calculated using the AutoDock Vina program, indicated that the complexed essential oil molecules exhibit the lowest energy. Electronic structure calculations were performed using the Gaussian16 program to analyze the structures obtained from the docking process. DFT calculations employing the ωB97XD functional to describe the inclusion complex and PM7 to describe the solvent model in the ONIOM approach revealed that molecules containing hydroxyl groups form hydrogen bonds with cyclodextrin, resulting in more stable structures compared to those lacking this functional group. Additionally, the use of explicit solvent facilitates the inclusion of essential oil molecules by altering the deformation energies of cyclodextrin. These theoretical results explain the advantage of using solvents in the preparation of experimental inclusion complexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39992416What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.