Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39992390›Full record

SynthesisDie Anaesthesiologie2025

[Systematic review of the effectiveness of local anaesthetics in the treatment of neuropathic pain or phantom pain].

Joanna Kastelik, Karsten Schwerdtfeger, Annette Stolle, Michael Schäfer, Sascha Tafelski

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Die Anaesthesiologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joanna KastelikKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. joanna.kastelik@charite.de.
Karsten SchwerdtfegerKlinik für Neurochirurgie, Medizinische Fakultät der Universität des Saarlandes, 66421, Homburg (Saar), Deutschland.
Annette StolleAndreas Wentzensen Forschungsinstitut, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland.
Michael SchäferKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
Sascha TafelskiKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland. sascha.tafelski@charite.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic pain is still a relevant medical and socioeconomic problem. The treatment focuses not only on pain reduction but also on functional treatment goals. Neuropathic pain includes biological, social and psychological aspects. In September 2023, the updated S3 guidelines for the management of peripheral nerve injuries were published. Multimodal pain management strategies encompassing systemic and local pharmacological, physiotherapeutic and occupational therapeutic interventions, are part of the guidelines. A central question addressed the widely debated treatment option using perineural local anaesthetics.

objectiveThe aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of local anaesthetic infiltration in the treatment of neuropathic pain following nerve injuries through a systematic literature review and evaluation of the evidence by a meta-analysis. MATERIAL AND

methodsAfter formulating a PICO (patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcomes) question (Infobox 1) within the guideline group, a selective literature analysis of controlled trials in databases (PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials-CENTRAL) was conducted until 31 July 2023. The literature was assessed by two reviewers and systematic reviews were examined for additional references. The studies were assessed using the Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 of the Cochrane Collaboration for randomized trials and the evidence was classified according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system.

resultsA total of 357 publications were identified in the literature search. After removing duplicates (n = 15) 327 publications were evaluated. The literature analysis showed heterogeneity with respect to the pain localization, local anaesthetics and reported outcomes. In an in-depth literature analysis one relevant study was identified and included in the evaluation of the evidence. This study enrolled and randomized 144 patients between December 2013 and October 2018 and evaluated the effectivity of the continuous infusion of local anaesthetics (lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 2.5 µg/ml as an initial bolus in both study groups followed by an infusion of ropivacaine 0.5% in the intervention group over 6 days) on the intensity of the phantom pain in comparison to the placebo group with a continuous infusion of saline over 6 days. The mean pain intensity and pain-related dysfunctions were reduced in the intervention group after 4 weeks. In the intervention group 25 patients and in the placebo group 40 patients received the crossover treatment after 4 weeks.

conclusionInfiltration with local anaesthetics represents a potential therapeutic option for neuropathic pain and phantom pain after amputations. A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled study from 2021 demonstrated lower pain intensity and a reduction in pain-related functional limitations after 4 weeks of continuous perineural local anesthetic infiltration. Further studies are necessary to establish a higher level of evidence regarding the effectiveness of minimally invasive pain treatment with local anaesthetics. In particular, long-term follow-up is necessary to be able to draw conclusions with respect to the analgesic efficacy of infiltration with local anaesthetics.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalNeuralgiaPhantom LimbHumansTreatment OutcomeAnesthetics, LocalChronic painLiterature analysisLocal anaesthesiaNerve injuryNeuroplasticity

Identifiers

PMID39992390
PMCPMC11876198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.