ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2025
Mapping Heat Vulnerability and Heat Risk for Neighborhood Health Risk Management in Urban Environment? Challenges and Opportunities.
Review in Current environmental health reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Epidemiologically validated spatial modelling reveals fine-scale heat health risks.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2026Article
- Environmental Scan of Tools and Frameworks Assessing Climate-Related Health Vulnerabilities in Older Populations.Environmental health insights · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewHeat vulnerability mapping (or heat risk mapping) is commonly used as a cost-effective tool to assess neighborhood health burdens for policy development and implementations. Some local governments have adopted this strategy to develop community action plans to cope with an increasing threat from heat exposure. However, various data/methods for mapping have yielded inconsistent results. For a compact city with high population density, issues from generic mapping techniques would become more apparent due to its complexity of social/environmental structures. RECENT
findingsWe explored the similarities/differences in existing heat vulnerability mapping approaches. Previous models (1) failed to characterize extreme heat variations (e.g. days with different temperature extremes, difference between single hot days and prolonged heat events); (2) generally lacked a validation of associations between mapping results and various health outcomes (e.g. only relying on mortality data for validation but no validation of morbidities or clinical visits); (3) had a low ability to incorporate spatiotemporal variability of demographic patterns (e.g. difference in daytime/nighttime population patterns due to daily mobility); (4) were unable to adopt perceived heat exposure (e.g. Universal Thermal Climate Index); and (5) did not measure heat vulnerability at street-/building-levels even though 3-dimensional urban forms exist across major cities. Additionally, most applications (including those from local governments) were developed from a top-down perspective without a participatory design. A location-specific, evidence-based framework based on various exposure patterns and health outcomes with bottom-up strategies for implementations is needed for minimizing bias from "one-size-fits-all" strategies for action plans across high-density cities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39992351What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.