Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39992331›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2025

Shapley-based saliency maps improve interpretability of vertebral compression fractures classification: multicenter study.

Liang Xia, Jun Zhang, Zhipeng Liang, Jun Tang, Jianguo Xia, Yongkang Liu

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liang XiaDepartment of Radiology, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 109 Longmian Road, Nanjing, 211002, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0456-1943
Jun ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 109 Longmian Road, Nanjing, 211002, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. zhangjun21416@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6666-8703
Zhipeng LiangDepartment of Radiology, Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 109 Longmian Road, Nanjing, 211002, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Jun TangDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 366 Taihu Road, Taizhou, 225300, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Jianguo XiaDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 366 Taihu Road, Taizhou, 225300, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Yongkang LiuDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 155 Hanzhong Road, Nanjing, 210004, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.

Funding

Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence Special Research Fund Project, Nanjing Medical Association Radiology Branch 09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvaluate the classification performance and interpretability of the Vision Transformer (ViT) model on acute and chronic vertebral compression fractures using Shapley significance maps. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study utilized medical imaging data from December 2018 to December 2023 from three hospitals in China. The study included 942 patients, with imaging data comprising X-rays, CTs, and MRIs. Patients were divided into training, validation, and test sets with a ratio of 7:2:1. The ViT model variant, SimpleViT, was fine-tuned on the training dataset. Statistical analyses were performed using the PixelMedAI platform, focusing on metrics such as ROC curves, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values, with statistical significance assessed using the DeLong test.

resultsA total of 942 patients (mean age 69.17 ± 10.61 years) were included, with 1076 vertebral fractures analyzed (705 acute, 371 chronic). In the test set, the ViT model demonstrated superior performance over the ResNet18 model, with an accuracy of 0.880 and an AUC of 0.901 compared to 0.843 and 0.833, respectively. The use of ViT Shapley saliency maps significantly enhanced diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, reaching 0.883 (95% CI: 0.800, 0.963) and 0.950 (95% CI: 0.891, 1.00), respectively.

conclusionIn vertebral compression fractures classification, Vision Transformer outperformed Convolutional Neural Network, providing more effective Shapley-based saliency maps that were favored by radiologists over GradCAM.

Indexed as

Fractures, CompressionSpinal FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overChinaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedDeep learningVertebral fracturesVision transformerX-ray imaging

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.