Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39992313›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Axon-specific microtubule regulation drives asymmetric regeneration of sensory neuron axons.

Ana Catarina Costa, Blanca R Murillo, Rita Bessa, Ricardo Ribeiro, Tiago Ferreira da Silva, Patrícia Porfírio-Rodrigues, Gabriel G Martins, Pedro Brites, Matthias Kneussel, Thomas Misgeld and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Association ofFrontiers in psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ana Catarina CostaNerve Regeneration Group, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC), Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5359-1981
Blanca R MurilloNerve Regeneration Group, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC), Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Rita BessaNerve Regeneration Group, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC), Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Ricardo RibeiroNerve Regeneration Group, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC), Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Tiago Ferreira da SilvaNeurolipid Biology Group, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC), Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Patrícia Porfírio-RodriguesAdvanced Imaging Unit, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Lisboa, Portugal.
Gabriel G MartinsAdvanced Imaging Unit, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6506-9776
Pedro BritesNeurolipid Biology Group, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC), Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Matthias KneusselInstitute of Molecular Neurogenetics, Center for Molecular Neurobiology Hamburg, ZMNH, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4900-366X
Thomas MisgeldInstitute of Neuronal Cell Biology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9875-6794
Monika S BrillInstitute of Neuronal Cell Biology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5422-9175
Monica M SousaNerve Regeneration Group, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular (IBMC), Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4524-2260

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft GRK1459Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft ID 450131873Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KN556/11-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft TRR 274/1 2020Deutsche Gesellschaft für Materialkunde LE 4610/1-1Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia COVID/BD/153330/2023Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia DRI/India/0336/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/143926/2019Synergy ID 390857198SyNergy EXC 2145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons have a unique pseudo-unipolar morphology in which a stem axon bifurcates into a peripheral and a central axon, with different regenerative abilities. Whereas peripheral DRG axons regenerate, central axons are unable to regrow. Central axon regeneration can however be elicited by a prior conditioning lesion to the peripheral axon. How DRG axon asymmetry is established remains unknown. Here we developed a rodent in vitro system replicating DRG pseudo-unipolarization and asymmetric axon regeneration. Using this model, we observed that from early development, central DRG axons have a higher density of growing microtubules. This asymmetry was also present in vivo and was abolished by a conditioning lesion that decreased microtubule polymerization of central DRG axons. An axon-specific microtubule-associated protein (MAP) signature, including the severases spastin and katanin and the microtubule regulators CRMP5 and tau, was found and shown to adapt upon conditioning lesion. Supporting its significance, interfering with the DRG MAP signature either in vitro or in vivo readily abolished central-peripheral asymmetries in microtubule dynamics and regenerative ability. In summary, our data unveil that axon-specific microtubule regulation drives asymmetric regeneration of sensory neuron axons.

Indexed as

AxonsGanglia, SpinalMicrotubulesNerve RegenerationSensory Receptor CellsAnimalsMiceRatsaxon growthaxon regenerationcargo sortingconditioning lesiondorsal root ganglionmicrotubulesmouseneuroscienceratregenerative medicinestem cells

Identifiers

PMID39992313
PMCPMC11850000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.