Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39992189›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of food safety2025

16S rRNA metabarcoding applied to the microbiome of insect products (novel food): a comparative analysis of three reference databases.

Gabriele Spatola, Alice Giusti, Laura Gasperetti, Roberta Nuvoloni, Alessandra Dalmasso, Francesco Chiesa, Andrea Armani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of food safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gabriele SpatolaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa. g.spatola2@studenti.unipi.it.
Alice GiustiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa. alice.giusti@vet.unipi.it.
Laura GasperettiExperimental Zooprophylactic Institute of Lazio and Tuscany, Pisa. laura.gasperetti@izslt.it.
Roberta NuvoloniDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa. roberta.nuvoloni@unipi.it.
Alessandra DalmassoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco (TO). alessandra.dalmasso@unito.it.
Francesco ChiesaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Grugliasco (TO). francesco.chiesa@unito.it.
Andrea ArmaniDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa. andrea.armani@unipi.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 16S rRNA metabarcoding, based on Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), is used to assess microbial biodiversity in various matrices, including food. The process involves a "dry-lab" phase where NGS data are processed through bioinformatic pipelines, which finally rely on taxonomic unit assignment against reference databases to assign them at order, genus, and species levels. Today, several public genomic reference databases are available for the taxonomic assignment of the 16S rRNA sequences. In this study, 42 insect-based food products were chosen as food models to find out how reference database choice could affect the microbiome results in food matrices. At the same time, this study aims to evaluate the most suitable reference database to assess the microbial composition of these still poorly investigated products. The V3-V4 region was sequenced by Illumina technology, and the R package "DADA2" was used for the bioinformatic analysis. After a bibliographic search, three public databases (SILVA, RDP, NCBI RefSeq) were compared based on amplicon sequence variant (ASV) assignment percentages at different taxonomic levels and diversity indices. SILVA assigned a significantly higher percentage of ASVs to the family and genus levels compared to RefSeq and RDP. However, no significant differences were noted in microbial composition between the databases according to α and β diversity results. A total of 121 genera were identified, with 56.2% detected by all three databases, though some taxa were identified only by one or two. The study highlights the importance of using updated reference databases for accurate microbiome characterization, contributing to the optimization of metabarcoding data analysis in food microbiota studies, including novel foods.

Identifiers

PMID39992189
PMCPMC11904769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.