ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2025
A novel framework for the automated characterization of Gram-stained blood culture slides using a large-scale vision transformer.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Gram stain interpretation accuracy between a computer-aided diagnosis app and microbiology specialists in blood culture samples.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Observational
- Artificial intelligence in clinical microbiology: results from the first National survey by the Italian association of clinical microbiologists.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- From microscopy to antimicrobial decisions: a clinically grounded roadmap for critical care infectious diseases.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
- Cross-Modality Learning for Predicting Immunohistochemistry Biomarkers from Hematoxylin and Eosin-Stained Whole Slide Images.The American journal of pathology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study introduces a new framework for the artificial intelligence-based characterization of Gram-stained whole-slide images (WSIs). As a test for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections, Gram stains provide critical early data to inform patient treatment in conjunction with data from rapid molecular tests. In this work, we developed a novel transformer-based model for Gram-stained WSI classification, which is more scalable to large data sets than previous convolutional neural network-based methods as it does not require patch-level manual annotations. We also introduce a large Gram stain data set from Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA) to evaluate our model, exploring the classification of five major categories of Gram-stained WSIs: gram-positive cocci in clusters, gram-positive cocci in pairs/chains, gram-positive rods, gram-negative rods, and slides with no bacteria. Our model achieves a classification accuracy of 0.858 (95% CI: 0.805, 0.905) and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.952 (95% CI: 0.922, 0.976) using fivefold nested cross-validation on our 475-slide data set, demonstrating the potential of large-scale transformer models for Gram stain classification. Results were measured against the final clinical laboratory Gram stain report after growth of organism in culture. We further demonstrate the generalizability of our trained model by applying it without additional fine-tuning on a second 27-slide external data set from Stanford Health (Palo Alto, California, USA) where it achieves a binary classification accuracy of 0.926 (95% CI: 0.885, 0.960) and an AUC of 0.8651 (95% CI: 0.6337, 0.9917) while distinguishing gram-positive from gram-negative bacteria. IMPORTANCE: This study introduces a scalable transformer-based deep learning model for automating Gram-stained whole-slide image classification. It surpasses previous methods by eliminating the need for manual annotations and demonstrates high accuracy and generalizability across multiple data sets, enhancing the speed and reliability of Gram stain analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.