Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39992156›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2025

A novel framework for the automated characterization of Gram-stained blood culture slides using a large-scale vision transformer.

Jack McMahon, Naofumi Tomita, Elizabeth S Tatishev, Adrienne A Workman, Cristina R Costales, Niaz Banaei, Isabella W Martin, Saeed Hassanpour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Artificial intelligence in clinical microbiology: results from the first National survey by the Italian association of clinical microbiologists.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jack McMahonDepartment of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Naofumi TomitaDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Elizabeth S TatishevDepartment of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Adrienne A WorkmanDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.
Cristina R CostalesDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Niaz BanaeiDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8501-3000
Isabella W MartinDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7974-9767
Saeed HassanpourDepartment of Computer Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9460-6414

Funding

Advancing Digital Pathology through Novel Machine Learning MethodologiesR01LM013833 · NLM · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Saeed Hassanpour · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
HHS | NIH | U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) R01LM013833NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013833
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study introduces a new framework for the artificial intelligence-based characterization of Gram-stained whole-slide images (WSIs). As a test for the diagnosis of bloodstream infections, Gram stains provide critical early data to inform patient treatment in conjunction with data from rapid molecular tests. In this work, we developed a novel transformer-based model for Gram-stained WSI classification, which is more scalable to large data sets than previous convolutional neural network-based methods as it does not require patch-level manual annotations. We also introduce a large Gram stain data set from Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA) to evaluate our model, exploring the classification of five major categories of Gram-stained WSIs: gram-positive cocci in clusters, gram-positive cocci in pairs/chains, gram-positive rods, gram-negative rods, and slides with no bacteria. Our model achieves a classification accuracy of 0.858 (95% CI: 0.805, 0.905) and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.952 (95% CI: 0.922, 0.976) using fivefold nested cross-validation on our 475-slide data set, demonstrating the potential of large-scale transformer models for Gram stain classification. Results were measured against the final clinical laboratory Gram stain report after growth of organism in culture. We further demonstrate the generalizability of our trained model by applying it without additional fine-tuning on a second 27-slide external data set from Stanford Health (Palo Alto, California, USA) where it achieves a binary classification accuracy of 0.926 (95% CI: 0.885, 0.960) and an AUC of 0.8651 (95% CI: 0.6337, 0.9917) while distinguishing gram-positive from gram-negative bacteria. IMPORTANCE: This study introduces a scalable transformer-based deep learning model for automating Gram-stained whole-slide image classification. It surpasses previous methods by eliminating the need for manual annotations and demonstrates high accuracy and generalizability across multiple data sets, enhancing the speed and reliability of Gram stain analysis.

Indexed as

BacteremiaBlood CultureGentian VioletImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhenazinesGram-Positive BacteriaHumansNeural Networks, ComputerStaining and LabelingGentian VioletGram's stainPhenazinesGram stainvision transformerwhole-slide bacterial classification

Identifiers

PMID39992156
PMCPMC11898657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.