ArticleAnti-cancer drugs2025
Low-dose anlotinib plus immune checkpoint inhibitors offers better efficacy and safety in advanced non-small cell lung cancer treatment.
Article in Anti-cancer drugs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The combination of anlotinib with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has become a common treatment modality in clinical practice. However, the optimal dose of anlotinib to use remains unclear. We collected patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received programmed cell death-1 blockade combined with different dose of anlotinib as second-line or later line therapy. Subsequently, the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy as well as subgroup analyses of different doses of anlotinib were analyzed. Cox regression was performed to analyze significant factors correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 50 eligible patients with NSCLC who received anlotinib combined with ICIs therapy were included, of which 27 received low-dose anlotinib (8 mg), and 23 were administered high-dose anlotinib (12 mg). The median PFS (mPFS) and the median OS (mOS) for all patients were 8.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.3-10.3] and 17.6 months (95% CI: 16.5-18.7), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that patients treated with 8 mg of anlotinib plus ICIs had significantly longer mPFS than those treated with 12 mg of anlotinib plus ICIs (8.7 vs 6.7 months, P = 0.016). The overall incidence of adverse events was 68.0%, and the most common adverse events of all grades were hypertension. Meanwhile, the incidence of adverse events was higher for 12 mg of anlotinib plus ICIs than that of 8 mg of anlotinib plus ICIs (82.6 vs 55.6%, P = 0.041). Low-dose anlotinib in combination with ICIs for advanced NSCLC may be an effective and well-tolerated option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.