ArticleInternational journal of cancer2025
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication use and endometrial cancer survival: A population-based Norwegian cohort study.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication use and endometrial cancer survival: A population-based Norwegian cohort study.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been shown to improve survival in certain cancers, data in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) is conflicting. This study investigated use of aspirin and nonaspirin NSAIDs (NA-NSAIDs) and EC-specific-and all-cause death. This nationwide cohort study linked data from the Cancer Registry of Norway with The Norwegian Prescription database. Patients diagnosed with EC from 2004 to 2018 were included. Post-diagnosis exposure to aspirin and NA-NSAIDs was defined as ≥3 consecutive prescriptions ≥30 days after EC diagnosis, with pre-diagnosis use as ≥2 filled prescriptions <6 months prior to diagnosis. Follow-up started 10 months after diagnosis. Hazard ratios for the risk of death were calculated with multivariable Cox-regression models. Our study population included 7751 individuals with EC, 685 (9%) were aspirin users and 620 (8%) were NA-NSAIDs users. The median follow-up time was 5.0 years, with 1518 (20%) deaths observed (n = 728 (9%) EC-specific). In multivariable analysis, aspirin use was significantly associated with a 19% higher risk of all-cause death compared to non-users (HR = 1.19, 95% CI [1.01-1.41]). The association was stronger among combined pre- and postdiagnosis use (HR = 1.35 [1.12-1.64]). NA-NSAIDs use increased risk of cancer-related death (HR = 1.25 [0.99-1.58]) and there was a dose-response association with significantly higher risk of cancer-specific death with higher cumulative doses (HR = 1.33 [1.02-1.75]). We found a higher risk of cancer-specific-and all-cause death among patients that used aspirin and NA-NSAIDs after a diagnosis of EC. Further studies on the biological mechanisms underlying these associations are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.