Trial reportThe British journal of surgery2025
Comparing the efficacy and safety of thromboprophylaxis with enoxaparin versus normal saline after liver transplantation: randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in The British journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abdominal Organ Transplantation: Noteworthy Literature in 2025.Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia · 2026Review
- Portal Vein Thrombosis, Management and Approaches in Liver Transplantation: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVenous thrombosis represents a significant complication after deceased-donor liver transplantation, yet there are currently no established protocols for thromboprophylaxis after deceased-donor liver transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic anticoagulation in patients undergoing deceased-donor liver transplantation.
methodsA dual-centre RCT of patients assigned to receive either enoxaparin or normal saline after liver transplantation was conducted. The primary efficacy outcome was the incidence of venous thrombosis (portal vein thrombosis and deep vein thrombosis) and the primary safety outcome was the incidence of major bleeding.
resultsA total of 462 patients were recruited. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 89 patients (19.3%) experienced venous thrombosis and 141 patients (30.5%) experienced major bleeding within 90 days after transplantation. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of venous thrombosis, portal vein thrombosis, or deep vein thrombosis between the two groups in the intention-to-treat cohort. The anticoagulant group demonstrated a markedly elevated incidence of major bleeding (35.5% versus 25.5%, P = 0.020). Subgroup analysis revealed that anticoagulation was associated with a lower risk of deep vein thrombosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients (HR 0.44 (95% c.i. 0.23 to 0.86), P = 0.016), without a significantly higher risk of major bleeding.
conclusionUse of prophylactic anticoagulation with enoxaparin is associated with a significantly higher incidence of major bleeding in patients undergoing deceased-donor liver transplantation, rather than a lower likelihood of venous thrombosis. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000032441 (www.chictr.org.cn).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.