ArticleTrauma, violence & abuse2026
Intergenerational Cycles of Maltreatment: An Updated Scoping Review of Psychosocial Risk and Protective Factors.
Article in Trauma, violence & abuse, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk and protective factors for the intergenerational transmission of child maltreatment in South Korea: a secondary analysis of data from the Family with Children's Life Experience Survey.Child health nursing research · 2026Article
- A Narrative Review of the Co-Occurrence and Interaction of Childhood Emotional Neglect and Overprotection in Developmental Pathways to Disordered Eating.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Understanding the link between maternal childhood maltreatment and mother-infant bonding: postpartum depressive symptoms as a mediator.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The intergenerational continuity of child maltreatment (CM) is a growing public health concern. Identifying modifiable risk and protective factors involved in these cycles is crucial. A previous scoping review synthesized the literature on psychosocial factors associated with intergenerational CM up to 2018. Since then, a sizable number of studies have been published; this updated review aims to summarize this recent literature. We conducted a comprehensive search across five major databases (PsycINFO, Scopus, Medline, Social Work Abstracts, and ProQuest Dissertations/Theses) from November 2018 to November 2023. The primary inclusion criterion was documentation of intergenerational maltreatment, with studies reporting at least one psychosocial risk or protective factor. Included studies involved human participants, presented original findings, were written in English or French, and employed any research design. This updated review included 29 new studies. Findings indicate that caregivers' individual (e.g., sociodemographic characteristics, psychopathology), relational (e.g., IPV, attachment), contextual (e.g., socioeconomic disadvantage), and historical factors (e.g., cumulative CM, out-of-home placement), along with characteristics of the second generation (e.g., sociodemographic characteristics, psychopathology), are involved in the intergenerational continuity of CM. The implications for practice suggest targeted interventions should address depression, PTSD, and emotional dysregulation in CM survivors, along with fostering secure, supportive family relationships, and positive parenting skills. Policy implications emphasize the need for enhanced support for child protection services in early CM identification, public policies to combat poverty, equitable childcare responsibilities, and funding for research in low-to-middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.