Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39991810›Full record

ArticlePsychology and psychotherapy2025

Young people's experiences of setting and monitoring goals in school-based counselling: A thematic analysis.

Charlie Duncan, Jacqueline Hayes, Mick Cooper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology and psychotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charlie DuncanUniversity of Roehampton, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0634-810X
Jacqueline HayesIndependent Researcher-Practitioner, Lewes, UK.
Mick CooperUniversity of Roehampton, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1492-2260

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand young people's experiences of setting and monitoring goals in the context of school-based counselling.

designQualitative interview study of young people aged 13-16 years old who had undertaken school-based counselling and who had explicitly set and monitored goals.

methodsNineteen young people who were predominantly female (89.5%) and around half of whom were of white/European and/or British ethnicity (52.6%) were recruited from 4 secondary schools in London, UK. A reflexive thematic analysis was undertaken to identify themes.

resultsFourteen themes were identified, which reflected both helpful and unhelpful aspects of working with goals. For some young people, goals were motivating, provided a tangible representation of progress, and focused the therapeutic work. For others, goals could mirror a sense of "stuckness" and elicit negative emotions when not progressed towards in a linear fashion. Assigning a number to goal progress meant that some young people felt it did not fully capture the context of their experience, although some did find this practice helpful. Similarly, not all young people found it helpful to monitor progress at every session.

conclusionsOur findings align with the wider adult literature in that experiences of working with goals are mixed. Recommendations for practice include offering choice in the frequency and way goal progress is monitored, and using clinical judgement when working with goals. This might include noticing when goal setting or monitoring is contributing to young people's feelings of low self-worth  and adjusting practice accordingly.

Indexed as

CounselingGoalsSchool Health ServicesAdolescentFemaleHumansLondonMaleMotivationQualitative Researchexperiencesmonitoring goalsSchool‐based counsellingsetting goalsthematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID39991810
PMCPMC12346242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.